What the reviewer found
General engineering AGENTS.md for a numerical-computing project: the HTML comment is just a version marker on a heading, the flagged 'do not decline' text only overrides a false precondition for one specific git-manifest command, and the file elsewhere hard-bans `rm -rf`/`git reset --hard` without explicit user permission. The 'curl' match is the vector-calculus curl operator in a physics section, not the network tool.
What was read
The file as it ships in Dicklesworthstone/frankensim:
AGENTS.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
P2Hidden instructions — false positiveAR1Tells the agent never to refuse — false positiveRMRecursive force delete — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.