What the reviewer found
Agent instructions for this project's own tooling: the HTML comment is a plain section divider (content right after it is ordinary issue-tracker workflow docs, not hidden instructions), the curl line tests the project's own signed install.sh, and the rm -rf/git reset text is a defensive rule forbidding those commands without explicit user permission.
example-or-fixture— an example or test fixtureinstalls-software— installs software
What was read
The file as it ships in Dicklesworthstone/ntm:
AGENTS.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
P2Hidden instructions — false positiveSC2Downloads and executes remote code — false positiveRMRecursive force delete — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.