Is remote_compilation_helper AGENTS.md safe to install?

Yes — remote_compilation_helper AGENTS.md is safe to install, with something worth knowing. Sonnet 5 read every file remote_compilation_helper AGENTS.md ships from Dicklesworthstone/remote_compilation_helper on 7 September 2026 and found nothing that acts against the person installing it; the static scan of its 26 rules grades it E.

Reviewed by Sonnet 5 on 7 September 2026 · a grade is what a scan and a reading found, not a guarantee · how this works

What the reviewer found

Project AGENTS.md for a Rust remote-compilation tool; the rm -rf line is an explicit 'never run without written permission' safety rule, and the HTML comments are plain visible section markers, not concealment. Worth flagging: it ships project source code to a fleet of remote VPS workers for compilation (disclosed) and tells the agent to spoof a fake 'OpenAI File Downloader/XaiImageApiFetch' user-agent on outbound curl requests.

What was read

The file as it ships in Dicklesworthstone/remote_compilation_helper:

What the static scan said

The scan flagged 3things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 3 as false.

How this review was made

Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.

Produced by agentmods.dev · Sonnet 5 · 7 September 2026

← Back to remote_compilation_helper AGENTS.md