omk CLAUDE.md

omk CLAUDE.md is an instructions file for coding agents from dmae97/omk. It costs 1,841 tokens per session, scanned A, original, no licence file.

Instructions for Claude Code in the open-multi-agent-kit (OMK) monorepo, a repository containing multiple related projects. They explain which instructions to read first, where the agent is operating, and which build, test, and check commands to use.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when Claude Code is operating in OMK, especially before building, testing, checking, or changing the runtime.
Why use it?
They prevent Claude Code from working without the repository’s required context or following the wrong instructions when several rule files apply.

Instructions file

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/dmae97/omk/claude-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dmae97/omk

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for omk CLAUDE.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/dmae97/omk/claude-md.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/dmae97/omk/claude-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/dmae97/omk/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/dmae97/omk/claude-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 1,841 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 1,841 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.01841 $0.01841
Opus 5 $0.00920 $0.00920
Sonnet 5 $0.00368 $0.00368
Haiku 4.5 $0.00184 $0.00184

Measured 4d ago against content hash d6e924e783c6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

omk CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

CLAUDE.md · 111 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 111 lines · 1,841 tokens per session scan A d6e924e783c6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

omk CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository dmae97/omk (142 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 1,841 tokens to every session, about $0.0092 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.