Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/dsnger/dev-workflow-kit/claude-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dsnger/dev-workflow-kitWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.09804 | $0.09804 |
| Opus 5 | $0.04902 | $0.04902 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.01961 | $0.01961 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00980 | $0.00980 |
Grade A, and why
dev-workflow-kit CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 613 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
dev-workflow-kit
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 613 lines · 9,804 tokens per session scan A 105fd38b236a
dev-workflow-kit CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository dsnger/dev-workflow-kit (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9,804 tokens to every session, about $0.0490 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
brooks-lint AGENTS.md
Instructions for hyhmrright/brooks-lint, covering agents.md, core purpose, skill integration, engineering standards and project structure.
vibeguard AGENTS.md
Instructions for majiayu000/vibeguard, covering agent instructions, scope, start here, core rules and delivery policy.
logic-lens GEMINI.md
Instructions for hyhmrright/logic-lens, covering logic-lens — developer guide (gemini cli), invoking skills, installation, project layout and key conventions.
yocto-lens AGENTS.md
Instructions for prashantdivate/yocto-lens: You are working on Yocto Lens, a Go static analysis tool for Yocto Project and OpenEmbedded metadata.
sdlc-quality copilot-instructions.md
Instructions for zircote-plugins/sdlc-quality, covering copilot instructions for sdlc plugin, project overview, repository structure, key conventions and rfc 2119 terminology.
ailinter AGENTS.md
Instructions for ailinter/ailinter, covering agents.md, agent tl;dr, sub-agent delegation (ailinter scans), when to invoke @ailinter and what @ailinter does.