Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/enriquelop/quartier/claude-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EnriqueLop/quartierWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/enriquelop/quartier/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/enriquelop/quartier/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/enriquelop/quartier/claude-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00804 | $0.00804 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00402 | $0.00402 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00161 | $0.00161 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00080 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
quartier CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quartier
Read and follow the instructions in PLAYBOOK.md. That file has the complete workflow.
Testing
Run npm test (Vitest, tests in test/*.test.js). Details in TESTING.md.
- When writing a new function, write a corresponding test
- When fixing a bug, write a regression test that would have caught it
- When adding error handling, write a test that triggers the error
- When adding a conditional, write tests for BOTH paths
- Never commit code that makes existing tests fail
Claude-specific
When generating HTML pages (home, subpages, showcase), use the /business-web-design skill (in .claude/skills/). It enforces the PLAYBOOK design quality bar mechanically: design-lock header, banned AI tells, motion degradation, and scripts/verify_design.py must report 0 FAILs before showing output. (/frontend-design remains available but is superseded for business sites — benchmarked at 62% vs 100% on the quality assertions, see .claude/skills/business-web-design-workspace/iteration-1/benchmark.md.)
Skill routing
When the user's request matches an available skill, invoke it via the Skill tool. The skill has multi-step workflows, checklists, and quality gates that produce better results than an ad-hoc answer. When in doubt, invoke the skill. A false positive is cheaper than a false negative.
Key routing rules:
- Product ideas, "is this worth building", brainstorming → invoke /office-hours
- Strategy, scope, "think bigger", "what should we build" → invoke /plan-ceo-review
- Architecture, "does this design make sense" → invoke /plan-eng-review
- Design system, brand, "how should this look" → invoke /design-consultation
- Design review of a plan → invoke /plan-design-review
- Developer experience of a plan → invoke /plan-devex-review
- "Review everything", full review pipeline → invoke /autoplan
- Bugs, errors, "why is this broken", "wtf", "this doesn't work" → invoke /investigate
- Test the site, find bugs, "does this work" → invoke /qa (or /qa-only for report only)
- Code review, check the diff, "look at my changes" → invoke /review
- Visual polish, design audit, "this looks off" → invoke /design-review
- Developer experience audit, try onboarding → invoke /devex-review
- Ship, deploy, create a PR, "send it" → invoke /ship
- Merge + deploy + verify → invoke /land-and-deploy
- Configure deployment → invoke /setup-deploy
- Post-deploy monitoring → invoke /canary
- Update docs after shipping → invoke /document-release
- Weekly retro, "how'd we do" → invoke /retro
- Second opinion, codex review → invoke /codex
- Safety mode, careful mode, lock it down → invoke /careful or /guard
- Restrict edits to a directory → invoke /freeze or /unfreeze
- Upgrade gstack → invoke /gstack-upgrade
- Save progress, "save my work" → invoke /context-save
- Resume, restore, "where was I" → invoke /context-restore
- Security audit, OWASP, "is this secure" → invoke /cso
- Make a PDF, document, publication → invoke /make-pdf
- Launch real browser for QA → invoke /open-gstack-browser
- Import cookies for authenticated testing → invoke /setup-browser-cookies
- Performance regression, page speed, benchmarks → invoke /benchmark
- Review what gstack has learned → invoke /learn
- Tune question sensitivity → invoke /plan-tune
- Code quality dashboard → invoke /health
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 59 lines · 804 tokens per session scan A 5418b06e530d
quartier CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository EnriqueLop/quartier (24 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 804 tokens to every session, about $0.0040 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other instructions, from other repositories
google-ai-mcp AGENTS.md
Instructions for sandraschi/google-ai-mcp, covering google-ai-mcp — agent guide, entry points, quick ref, ports and architecture.
antigravity-cloud-run AGENTS.md
Instructions for ykdojo/antigravity-cloud-run, covering antigravity on cloud run, testing end to end, multiple sessions, mounting local projects and research sessions.
google-ai-mcp CLAUDE.md
Instructions for sandraschi/google-ai-mcp, covering google-ai-mcp — claude code guide, entry points, standards and key files.
AIQSA AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for insciqq/AIQSA, covering agents, autonomy trigger, completion policy, reading map and contract authority.
AIQSA CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for insciqq/AIQSA, a project described as: Self-hosted Question → Search → Answer workspace with explicit control over AI providers, models, search, MCP tools, and run data.
Search-mcp AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for ferre-z/Search-mcp, covering agents.md — eyes-mcp, build & verify, running the cli, running the server and architecture facts.