Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/evilstar2016/skill-doctor/agents-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/evilstar2016/skill-doctorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/evilstar2016/skill-doctor/agents-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/evilstar2016/skill-doctor/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/evilstar2016/skill-doctor/agents-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01094 | $0.01094 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00547 | $0.00547 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00219 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00109 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
skill-doctor AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 93 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Repository Guidelines
Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
- When retrieving and analyzing code, prioritize using the ast symbol tools.
Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 93 lines · 1,094 tokens per session scan A 1ef61a43aaaa
skill-doctor AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository evilstar2016/skill-doctor (7 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,094 tokens to every session, about $0.0055 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
hiveshare CLAUDE.md
Instructions for KB-perByte/hiveshare, covering hiveshare — claude.md, repo layout, build & run, key env vars (server) and naming: hive vs memory.
llm-safe-haven CLAUDE.md
Instructions for pleasedodisturb/llm-safe-haven, covering llm safe haven, what this is, project structure, tdd — non-negotiable (adopted 2026-08-17) and the contract.
kleosrules AGENTS.md
Instructions for kleosr/kleosrules, a project described as: Cursor harness pack: user rules, skills, Bash hooks, local HANDOFF memory. macOS, Linux, Windows (WSL).
finding-unknowns-skills CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for Neeeophytee/finding-unknowns-skills, covering repo notes, what ships, and the gate that decides, version lives in three manifests — move them together, files that must be edited together and shipped guidance is not this file.
coding-agent-safety-gate AGENTS.md
Instructions for ASER-ho/coding-agent-safety-gate, covering agents / 代理规则, 仓库类型 / repository type and ai 代理规则 / rules for ai coding agents.
yapcap CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for TopiCsarno/yapcap, a project described as: Native COSMIC panel applet showing local usage limits for Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.