brain-in-the-fish: Instructions file for Claude Code

CLAUDE.md

brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md is an instructions file for Claude Code from fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish. It costs 569 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of project instructions for evaluating documents by turning their claims into connected knowledge graphs and checking them against evidence. It covers scoring, debate, moderation, reports, and verdicts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when changing or reviewing the Brain in the Fish project, its document-processing pipeline, scoring system, debate flow, or evidence checks.
Why use it?
It gives a coding agent the project’s structure and rules for evidence-based document evaluation, so it can work with the right modules and tools.

Instructions file for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: the file is CLAUDE.md.

This is fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on brain-in-the-fish itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything brain-in-the-fish configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/main/CLAUDE.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/claude-md/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/claude-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/claude-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish/claude-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 569 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 569 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00569 $0.00569
Opus 5.5 $0.00228 $0.00228
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00114 $0.00114
Haiku 4.5 $0.00057 $0.00057

Measured 2mo ago against content hash a3dec5f88298, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

CLAUDE.md · 57 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Brain in the Fish

Score any document. Prove every claim. The LLM decomposes documents into OWL knowledge graphs, SPARQL rules mine facts from the graph, and a gate verifies the score is consistent with the evidence.

Relationship to open-ontologies

This project depends on open-ontologies as a library (../open-ontologies). It uses the ontology engine (GraphStore, Reasoner, SPARQL) to load and query document argument graphs. It is NOT a fork — it consumes open-ontologies as a dependency.

Module Overview

Module Purpose
types Core evaluation domain types
ingest PDF ingestion and document ontology generation
criteria Evaluation criteria ontology loading/generation
agent Agent cognitive model and spawning
scoring Independent scoring engine with ReACT loop
debate Multi-round structured debate orchestrator
moderation Consensus moderation and convergence detection
report Evaluation report generation
gate Verdict system — CONFIRMED/FLAGGED/REJECTED based on evidence
rules SPARQL rule mining over argument graphs (8 rules)
argument_graph OWL Turtle → typed argument graph with structural metrics
server MCP server exposing eval_* and eds_* tools
snn Deprecated — legacy scoring, use gate module instead

Pipeline

  1. LLM reads document → produces OWL Turtle (typed nodes with source quotes)
  2. Turtle loads into GraphStore → structural metrics extracted via SPARQL
  3. SPARQL INSERT rules derive facts (StrongClaim, UnsupportedClaim, etc.)
  4. Gate compares LLM holistic score against structural + quality evidence
  5. Verdict: CONFIRMED / FLAGGED / REJECTED

Read the full file on GitHub · 57 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 569 tokens per session scan A a3dec5f88298

Subscribe to this mod's changes

brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository fabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fish (97 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 569 tokens to every session, about $0.0023 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md compared with instructions from other repositories

brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.md next to 6 instructions from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
brain-in-the-fish CLAUDE.mdfabio-rovai/brain-in-the-fishInstructions file972mo agoMITA569Claude Code
vscode buildNext.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscodeInstructions file195kyesterdayMITA9,719GitHub Copilot
next.js AGENTS.mdvercel/next.jsInstructions file143kyesterdayMITA7,461Codex, OpenCode
langchain AGENTS.mdlangchain-ai/langchainInstructions file149kyesterdayMITA4,680Codex, OpenCode
vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscodeInstructions file195kyesterdayMITA5,516GitHub Copilot
vscode copilot-instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscodeInstructions file195kyesterdayMITA3,093GitHub Copilot
deepseek-harness AGENTS.mddeepseek-ai/deepseek-harnessInstructions file274k2d agoMITA4,313Codex, OpenCode