open-chat AGENTS.md

open-chat AGENTS.md is an instructions file for Codex, OpenCode from faith-tools/open-chat. It costs 1,579 tokens per session, scanned A, original, no licence file.

Repository guidance for coding agents working on faith-tools/open-chat. It covers the project, getting started, its structure, and configuration.

In plain words
What is it for?
Understanding open-chat, starting it, navigating its architecture, and handling its environment settings.
Why use it?
It gives an agent the project-specific context and rules needed to work in the repository.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/faith-tools/open-chat/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/faith-tools/open-chat

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for open-chat AGENTS.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/faith-tools/open-chat/agents-md.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/faith-tools/open-chat/agents-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/faith-tools/open-chat/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/faith-tools/open-chat/agents-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 1,579 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 1,579 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.01579 $0.01579
Opus 5 $0.00790 $0.00790
Sonnet 5 $0.00316 $0.00316
Haiku 4.5 $0.00158 $0.00158

Measured 4d ago against content hash 8fcfa15f1abd, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

open-chat AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

AGENTS.md · 71 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 71 lines · 1,579 tokens per session scan A 8fcfa15f1abd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

open-chat AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository faith-tools/open-chat (5 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 1,579 tokens to every session, about $0.0079 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.