Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/goklab/guardvibe/claude-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/goklab/guardvibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/goklab/guardvibe/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/goklab/guardvibe/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/goklab/guardvibe/claude-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00597 | $0.00597 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00298 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00119 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00060 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
guardvibe CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Guidelines
GuardVibe Security Scanner
468 rules, 39 tools. Deterministic: same code = same hash = same results.
When user asks for security scan/fix:
Step 1: Run this exact command:
npx guardvibe audit --format json 2>&1 | head -1
Step 2: Parse the JSON. It contains:
sections[]— each section hassectionFindings[]with individual issuesremediationPlan— step-by-step fix instructions for each section
Step 3: For EACH section that has findings > 0, fix every finding listed in sectionFindings[]. Each finding has ruleId, file, line, name, fix.
Step 4: After fixing ALL sections, run the audit command again. If findings dropped, you did it right. If not, your fix didn't work — read the finding again and try differently.
Step 5: Repeat until verdict is PASS or findings are 0.
NEVER do these:
- NEVER use
npx guardvibe diffwhen asked for a full security scan — that only checks changed files - NEVER say "MCP tools not available" — always use CLI:
npx guardvibe - NEVER declare "done" after fixing only 1 section — you must fix ALL sections
- NEVER dismiss findings as "false positive" — if GuardVibe reports it, fix it or use
.guardvibercto configure exceptions - NEVER skip the re-audit step — always verify your fixes actually reduced the finding count
Quick reference
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| Full audit | npx guardvibe audit --format json 2>&1 | head -1 |
| Check one file | npx guardvibe check <file> --format json |
| Explain a rule | npx guardvibe explain <RULE_ID> |
| Auth coverage | npx guardvibe auth-coverage --format json |
| Pre-commit scan | npx guardvibe scan --staged |
Writing secure code
- Every API route: auth check before DB access
- Every POST endpoint: input validation (zod schema)
- Never pass user input to innerHTML, eval, exec, or raw SQL
- Use parameterized queries, never string concatenation for SQL
- Set security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 57 lines · 597 tokens per session scan A c2a8cfdc629d
guardvibe CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository goklab/guardvibe (5 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 597 tokens to every session, about $0.0030 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
agent-security-scanner-mcp CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for sinewaveai/agent-security-scanner-mcp, covering claude.md, build and development commands, install dependencies, run all tests (28 test files, 420+ tests, 4.5 min) and run specific test file.
vectimus AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for vectimus/vectimus, covering agents.md, what is vectimus?, tech stack, development commands and project layout.
vibe-stack AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for vibestackdev/vibe-stack, covering agents.md — ai coding agent instructions, project overview, tech stack, architecture principles and directory structure.
vibe-stack CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for vibestackdev/vibe-stack, covering claude.md — vibe stack architecture rules, for use with claude code (anthropic's agentic cli), project overview, tech stack and critical build commands.
llm-safe-haven CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for pleasedodisturb/llm-safe-haven, covering llm safe haven, what this is, project structure, tdd — non-negotiable (adopted 2026-08-17) and the contract.
llm-safe-haven AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for pleasedodisturb/llm-safe-haven, covering agents.md, what this file is (and isn't), why this shape (d-08), working agreements and current state.