aiboarding CLAUDE.md

aiboarding CLAUDE.md is an instructions file for Claude Code from gustavo-meilus/aiboarding. It costs 61 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

Repository instructions for maintaining AI-agent onboarding guidance in AGENTS.md and related configuration files.

In plain words
What is it for?
Generating, compressing, auditing, and updating onboarding material and Claude-specific lifecycle settings.
Why use it?
They keep setup information aligned across Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, and OpenCode.

Instructions file for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: the file is CLAUDE.md. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; mentions AGENTS.md.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/gustavo-meilus/aiboarding/claude-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gustavo-meilus/aiboarding

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for aiboarding CLAUDE.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/gustavo-meilus/aiboarding/claude-md.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/gustavo-meilus/aiboarding/claude-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/gustavo-meilus/aiboarding/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/gustavo-meilus/aiboarding/claude-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 61 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 61 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00061 $0.00061
Opus 5 $0.00030 $0.00030
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00012
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00006

Measured 5d ago against content hash fb80eadfdbd4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

aiboarding CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

CLAUDE.md · 6 lines

What it actually says

@AGENTS.md

Use AGENTS.md as canonical project guidance. Keep Claude-specific lifecycle wiring in .claude/settings.json and .aiboarding/.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 6 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A fb80eadfdbd4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

aiboarding CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository gustavo-meilus/aiboarding (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.