harness-evals AGENTS.md

harness-evals AGENTS.md is an instructions file for Codex, OpenCode from harness/harness-evals. It costs 5,922 tokens per session, scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

Project instructions for harness-evals, an open-source Python framework that scores AI agents, prompts, and structured outputs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when developing or evaluating harness-evals metrics, including deterministic, reliability, retrieval, safety, agent, conversation, MCP, or security evaluations.
Why use it?
They explain the project’s package names, installation options, data flow, scoring model, and testing and formatting expectations.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/harness/harness-evals/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harness/harness-evals

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for harness-evals AGENTS.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/harness/harness-evals/agents-md.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/harness/harness-evals/agents-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/harness/harness-evals/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/harness/harness-evals/agents-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 5,922 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 5,922 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.05922 $0.05922
Opus 5 $0.02961 $0.02961
Sonnet 5 $0.01184 $0.01184
Haiku 4.5 $0.00592 $0.00592

Measured 3d ago against content hash 1fd9c3a133a7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

harness-evals AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

AGENTS.md · 478 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 478 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

AGENTS.md - harness-evals

Project Overview

harness-evals is an open-source AI evaluation framework for LLM agents, prompts, and structured outputs. It provides a pip install-able scoring engine with 70+ metrics across deterministic, structural, operational, reliability, predictability, MCP, similarity, LLM-judged, RAG, safety, agent, conversation, and security categories.

Core principle: An eval always produces a Score. Every metric is a single class with a measure() method.

Data flow: Golden (authored) + agent output -> EvalCase (evaluated) -> Score (result)

Language: Python 3.10+ License: Apache 2.0 Package name: harness-evals Import name: harness_evals

Build System

pip install -e "."                # Core only (deterministic metrics, no LLM key needed)
pip install -e ".[llm]"           # + OpenAI, Anthropic for LLM-judged metrics
pip install -e ".[otlp]"          # + OTLP metrics & traces export
pip install -e ".[langfuse]"      # + Langfuse source/sink
pip install -e ".[similarity]"    # + BLEU metric (nltk)
pip install -e ".[harness]"       # + Harness AI Service LLM provider
pip install -e ".[benchmarks]"    # + Academic benchmarks (MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEval, etc.)
pip install -e ".[all]"           # Everything
pip install -e ".[all,dev]"       # Everything + dev tools

Build tool: Poetry via pyproject.toml (backend: poetry-core) No compiled extensions — pure Python.

Testing

pytest tests/ -v                              # All tests
pytest tests/ -v -m unit                      # Unit tests only
pytest tests/metrics/ -v                      # Specific directory
pytest tests/test_core.py -v                  # Specific file
pytest tests/test_core.py::test_evaluate -v   # Specific function
pytest tests/ --cov=harness_evals --cov-report=html  # With coverage
  • Mark tests: @pytest.mark.unit, @pytest.mark.integration
  • Test data: tests/data/

ALWAYS run pytest tests/ -v before committing.

Read the full file on GitHub · 478 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 478 lines · 5,922 tokens per session scan A 1fd9c3a133a7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

harness-evals AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository harness/harness-evals (24 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 5,922 tokens to every session, about $0.0296 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.