Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to hoophq/fence. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hoophq/fence/main/CLAUDE.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hoophq/fenceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/hoophq/fence/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/hoophq/fence/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/hoophq/fence/claude-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/hoophq/fence/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/hoophq/fence/claude-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.01815 | $0.01815 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00726 | $0.00726 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00363 | $0.00363 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00181 | $0.00181 |
Grade A, and why
fence CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 111 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CLAUDE.md
Project Overview
Fence is a standalone Go CLI: guardrails for AI coding agents. It inspects an
agent's tool calls (through that agent's hook system) and blocks or asks before
catastrophic ones run — recursive deletes of home/root, secret exfiltration,
curl | sh, force-pushes. Standalone Go module, Go 1.26, no runtime services.
Scope is deliberate. Fence is local self-protection: dev-owned, dev-editable, and it fails open. It is intentionally not a compliance or central-enforcement product — keep un-bypassable policy, fleet management, central audit, and approval workflows out of scope.
Commands
make build→./dist/fence·make test·make vet·make fmt·make tidy- Raw:
go build ./...·go test ./...·go vet ./...·gofmt -l . go test ./...is the gate — tests pin the false-positive discipline.- Test a rule without an agent:
fence check 'rm -rf ~'(prints a DENY/ASK/WARN/ALLOW card). - Exercise the hook directly:
echo '{"cwd":".","tool_name":"Bash","tool_input":{"command":"rm -rf ~"}}' | ./dist/fence hook claude-code
Architecture — agent-neutral core + per-agent adapters
internal/policy/— engine (Evaluate, deny-overrides resolution), the neutralAction/Effect/Decisiontypes,Rule/Match/Rulepack, and the embeddedbuiltin/recommended.yamldefault pack.internal/analyzer/shell/— shell-AST analysis viamvdan.cc/shproducing semantic facts (recursive-delete + target class, force-push, history-rewrite, net→shell pipe). This is the differentiator — see Conventions.internal/adapter/<agent>/— translate one agent's tool call ⇄ neutralAction.claudecode(Claude Code PreToolUse + the statusLine session proof, with the SessionStart banner as fallback when another status line owns the slot) came first;codexspeaks Codex's Claude-compatible hook envelope with its own tool vocabulary (Bash,apply_patch— expanded to one file_write per touched file, most severe verdict wins);opencodehas no hook protocol at all — a generated JS shim plugin (fence init opencodewrites it, template embedded ininternal/cli/opencode_plugin.js) pipes tool calls tofence hook opencode, and its only block primitive is throwing, soaskdegrades to a soft block that routes the agent to the user. Adapters stay self-contained even where the wire formats coincide — the protocols are owned by different vendors and may drift. Decisions and chat notices ride the same JSON envelope; an explicit "allow" decision is never emitted (it would bypass the user's own permission settings).internal/store/— the user-level state dir (~/.fence): packs installed viafence add(the packs dir is the source of truth) +packs.lock.jsonmetadata.internal/registry/— fetch + sha256-verify packs from a static index (registry/in this repo, read raw off main). Only the explicit commands import it — nothing on the eval path may ever touch the network.internal/cli/— Cobra commands:check,hook,init,uninstall,add,search,update,remove,version.plugins.godetects a Claude Code plugin that already runs the Fence hook (see Conventions).cmd/fence/— entrypoint;versionis injected via-ldflags "-X main.version=...".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 111 lines · 1,815 tokens per session scan E 2e82b7e62bb5
fence CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository hoophq/fence (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,815 tokens to every session, about $0.0073 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other instructions, from other repositories
vscode buildNext.instructions.md
Working notes and architecture documentation for the new esbuild-based build system in build/next. Use when making changes to the new build pipeline (transpile/bundle commands, NLS plugin, source-map handling, resource copying, or self-hosting watch tasks).
next.js AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for vercel/next.js, covering next.js development guide, codebase structure, monorepo overview, core package: packages/next and other important packages.
vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.md
Instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code oss third-party-notices pipeline, architecture, pipeline flow in ci, cache eligibility and rollout and applying the notice (cutover).
langchain AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for langchain-ai/langchain, covering global development guidelines for the langchain monorepo, corridor security analysis, project architecture and context, monorepo structure and development tools & commands.
vscode copilot-instructions.md
Copilot instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code copilot instructions, project overview, root folders, core architecture (src/ folder) and built-in extensions (extensions/ folder).
vscode model-prompts.instructions.md
Model-specific prompt authoring and registry guidelines.