What the reviewer found
Same source document as the sibling copilot-instructions.md, compiled for the `claude` target instead. Identical findings, identical false positives: the generated-file comment is not hidden instructions, `curl | sh` is on the workspace's banned-installer list, and the `find` command is a duplicate-filename audit.
What was read
The file as it ships in HsuanYuLee/polaris:
CLAUDE.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
P2Hidden instructions — false positiveSC2Downloads and executes remote code — false positiveAS3Enumerates other installed skills — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.