nv-context GEMINI.md

nv-context GEMINI.md is an instructions file for Gemini CLI from johnnichev/nv-context. It costs 82 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of instructions that maps nv-context actions to equivalent Gemini CLI commands, such as reading, writing, editing, searching, and running shell commands.

In plain words
What is it for?
Working with files, searching code, finding paths, and running shell commands through the nv-context setup.
Why use it?
It helps an agent use the right Gemini CLI operation for common repository tasks without guessing the command mapping.

Instructions file for Gemini CLI

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/johnnichev/nv-context/gemini-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/johnnichev/nv-context

Made for: Gemini CLI.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for nv-context GEMINI.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/johnnichev/nv-context/gemini-md.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/johnnichev/nv-context/gemini-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/johnnichev/nv-context/gemini-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/johnnichev/nv-context/gemini-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 82 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 82 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00082 $0.00082
Opus 5 $0.00041 $0.00041
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00016
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00008

Measured 3d ago against content hash a3a1256c2d64, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

nv-context GEMINI.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

GEMINI.md · 15 lines

What it actually says

nv:context — Gemini CLI Support

Skill

  • nv-context — Context engineering setup for any repository.

Tool Mapping

  • Readread_file
  • Writewrite_file
  • Editedit_file
  • Globglob
  • Grepgrep
  • Bashshell
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 15 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A a3a1256c2d64

Subscribe to this mod's changes

nv-context GEMINI.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository johnnichev/nv-context (7 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.