Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to MARVserver/Foliacode. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MARVserver/Foliacode/main/AGENTS.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MARVserver/FoliacodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/marvserver/foliacode/agents-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/marvserver/foliacode/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/marvserver/foliacode/agents-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/marvserver/foliacode/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/marvserver/foliacode/agents-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.02145 | $0.02145 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00858 | $0.00858 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00429 | $0.00429 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00215 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
Foliacode AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AGENTS.md — driving FoliaCode from an AI assistant
This file tells a coding assistant (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Copilot, or any agent framework) how to operate FoliaCode correctly. It is written to be read by a machine and acted on without further explanation.
If you are a human, you probably want README.md instead.
The one rule that matters
analyze is always safe. verify executes downloaded third-party code — ask the
user before you run it. transform writes a new JAR — dry-run it first.
foliacode analyze only reads bytecode. It touches no network, starts no process,
and changes no file unless --json is given. Run it freely.
foliacode verify downloads a Folia server jar from PaperMC and executes it on the
user's machine. It is gated behind explicit consent (--yes, or enabled: true in
foliacode.yml) precisely so that an agent cannot enable it by accident.
Do not pass --yes on your own initiative. Ask first, in plain language:
"I can also boot a throwaway Folia server to confirm the plugin actually loads. That downloads a ~50 MB server jar from PaperMC and runs it locally for about a minute, then deletes it. Want me to?"
If the user has already put enabled: true in foliacode.yml, that is their
standing consent and you may run verify without asking again.
foliacode transform never modifies the input JAR — it writes a new one beside it —
so it is not destructive. But it produces an artifact the user may deploy, so run
--dry-run first and show them what would change before writing anything. Never
describe a transformed JAR as "Folia-ready": say which call sites were rewritten and
which were refused.
Quick reference
# Static analysis — safe, offline, fast (~0.4s for 2000 classes)
foliacode analyze MyPlugin.jar
# Every JAR in a directory
foliacode analyze plugins/
# Machine-readable output for you to parse
foliacode analyze plugins/ --json report.json
# Gate a CI job on thread-safety issues, not just fatal ones
foliacode analyze plugins/ --fail-on HIGH
# Show every call site instead of the first three per rule
foliacode analyze MyPlugin.jar --verbose
# List the rule set (useful for explaining a finding to a user)
foliacode rules
# Real server boot — ONLY after the user agrees
foliacode verify MyPlugin.jar --yes --memory 2048
# Boot with dependency plugins installed alongside
foliacode verify MyPlugin.jar --yes --with Vault.jar --with ProtocolLib.jar
# Boot and record which flagged calls actually ran, and on which threads
foliacode verify MyPlugin.jar --yes --instrument
# See what a rewrite would change — safe, writes nothing
foliacode transform MyPlugin.jar --dry-run
# Write the rewritten JAR (the original is left alone)
foliacode transform MyPlugin.jar --json transform.json
# Print the -javaagent line for a server the user runs themselves
foliacode agent MyPlugin.jar
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 226 lines · 2,145 tokens per session scan A 130c306b0fbf
Foliacode AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository MARVserver/Foliacode (11 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 2,145 tokens to every session, about $0.0086 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Foliacode AGENTS.md compared with instructions from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foliacode AGENTS.mdMARVserver/Foliacode | Instructions file | 11 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 2,145 | Codex, OpenCode |
| vscode buildNext.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | today | MIT | A | 9,719 | GitHub Copilot |
| next.js AGENTS.mdvercel/next.js | Instructions file | 143k | today | MIT | A | 7,461 | Codex, OpenCode |
| vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | today | MIT | A | 5,516 | GitHub Copilot |
| langchain AGENTS.mdlangchain-ai/langchain | Instructions file | 149k | yesterday | MIT | A | 4,680 | Codex, OpenCode |
| vscode copilot-instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | today | MIT | A | 3,093 | GitHub Copilot |
| vscode ai-customization.instructions.mdmicrosoft/vscode | Instructions file | 195k | today | MIT | A | 1,907 | GitHub Copilot |