lazyazure AGENTS.md

lazyazure AGENTS.md is an instructions file for Codex, OpenCode from matsest/lazyazure. It costs 9,566 tokens per session, scanned A, original, MIT.

Project guidance for LazyAzure, a terminal-based interface for managing Microsoft Azure resources. It covers the Go interface library, Azure access, authentication, and safe handling of locks while updating the screen.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when changing LazyAzure's terminal views, cursor behavior, event handling, Azure operations, authentication, or mutex-protected code.
Why use it?
It helps agents avoid freezing the terminal interface or causing concurrency errors when background work and screen updates happen together.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/matsest/lazyazure/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/matsest/lazyazure

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for lazyazure AGENTS.md

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/matsest/lazyazure/agents-md.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/matsest/lazyazure/agents-md)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/matsest/lazyazure/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/matsest/lazyazure/agents-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 9,566 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 9,566 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.09566 $0.09566
Opus 5 $0.04783 $0.04783
Sonnet 5 $0.01913 $0.01913
Haiku 4.5 $0.00957 $0.00957

Measured 5d ago against content hash dd5d5cec27a9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

lazyazure AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

AGENTS.md · 1,033 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,033 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

LazyAzure - Agent Guidelines

This document provides guidelines and lessons learned for agents working on the LazyAzure codebase.

Project Overview

LazyAzure is a TUI (Terminal User Interface) application for Azure resource management, inspired by lazydocker. It uses:

  • gocui for the terminal interface
  • Azure SDK for Go for Azure API interactions
  • DefaultAzureCredential for authentication (supports multiple auth methods)

Critical Guidelines

1. TUI Development with gocui

Event Loop and Threading
  • CRITICAL: Never hold locks (mutex) when calling gocui operations
  • CRITICAL: Never call gui.g.Update() or gui.g.UpdateAsync() while holding a lock
  • Use go func() for async operations, then use gui.g.UpdateAsync() for UI updates
  • UpdateAsync() is safer than Update() as it doesn't spawn a goroutine
Cursor Handling
  • Use v.SetCursor(x, y) directly instead of v.TextArea.MoveCursorDown/Up
  • Get cursor position with v.Cursor() which returns (x, y)
  • Don't mix cursor tracking with origin/offset calculations unless necessary
View Management
  • Use gocui.IsUnknownView(err) to check if a view already exists
  • Views are identified by string names (e.g., "subscriptions", "resourcegroups")
  • Set current view with gui.g.SetCurrentView("viewname")

2. Mutex Best Practices

Deadlock Prevention
// ❌ WRONG: Holding lock while calling another function that needs lock
func (gui *Gui) nextLine() {
    gui.mu.Lock()
    defer gui.mu.Unlock()
    gui.selectItem()  // selectItem() also needs Lock = DEADLOCK!
}

// ✅ CORRECT: Release lock before calling other methods
func (gui *Gui) nextLine() {
    gui.mu.RLock()
    count := len(gui.items)
    gui.mu.RUnlock()
    
    // ... do work ...
    
    gui.selectItem()  // Now safe to acquire Lock
}
Lock Hierarchy
  1. RLock() for reading data length/slices
  2. Do work without locks
  3. Lock() only for updating state
  4. Never hold locks during I/O or UI operations

Read the full file on GitHub · 1,033 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 1,033 lines · 9,566 tokens per session scan A dd5d5cec27a9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

lazyazure AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository matsest/lazyazure (46 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9,566 tokens to every session, about $0.0478 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.