stoop AGENTS.md

Repository instructions for Stoop, including how Tegami versioning and publishing work. Tegami uses pending files to collect package changes before publishing.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when writing pending changelog files, documenting user-facing changes, fixing a button hover state, or referring to packages and package groups.
Why use it?
They prevent release notes from being placed in the wrong files or using invalid package references.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/mislavjc/stoop/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mislavjc/stoop

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Per session 239 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 239 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 95% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00239 $0.00239
Opus 5 $0.00120 $0.00120
Sonnet 5 $0.00048 $0.00048
Haiku 4.5 $0.00024 $0.00024

Measured 2d ago against content hash 9c42f1c851e6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

stoop AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

95% identical to core AGENTS.md — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

AGENTS.md · 38 lines

What it actually says

Release workflow

This repository uses Tegami for versioning and publishing.

Write changelog files

Create pending changelog files under .tegami/ as YYYY-MM-DD-{hash}.md.

See the changelog format docs for details.

Example

---
packages:
  "npm:@acme/ui": patch
---

### Fix button hover state

The hover color now matches the design system.

Package references

Use package names, ids, or groups in frontmatter. For example:

  • "@acme/ui" — package name
  • "npm:@acme/ui" — package id
  • "group:acme" — every package in a group

Rules:

  • Include YAML frontmatter with packages
  • Include at least one #, ##, or ### heading in the body
  • Write user-facing release notes under each heading
  • Do not edit the publish lock file (.tegami/publish-lock.yaml) or package CHANGELOG.md files directly
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 38 lines · 239 tokens per session scan A 9c42f1c851e6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

stoop AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository mislavjc/stoop (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 239 tokens to every session, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to core AGENTS.md, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.