Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp/claude-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp/claude-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00414 | $0.00414 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00207 | $0.00207 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00083 | $0.00083 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00041 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
langflow-mcp CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Engineering rules
The waste in AI-written code is not wrong code — it is too much code. Left alone, an agent pulls in three dependencies and five layers of abstraction for something the standard library does in ten lines; asked to fix it, it writes two hundred more. These rules exist to stop that before the first line is written: don't write what needn't be written, reuse what can be reused, don't complicate what can stay simple.
- Do not preserve backward compatibility. Delete what is obsolete. No compatibility layers, no migrations, no leftover fallbacks.
- Choose the simplest implementation that meets the current requirement. No pre-emptive abstraction, no configuration layer nobody asked for.
- Grow the system in layers. Get a minimal end-to-end version working first, then add on top of it. Never tear down something that works for the sake of unfinished complexity.
- Keep components modular and concerns separated.
- Prefer mature, maintained libraries. Do not rewrite one yourself without a clear reason.
- Check what the project's existing dependencies already do before adding a package or writing your own. Do not assume a library lacks a capability — read its docs and types first.
- Make architectural decisions for the long term. Do not accept a "this way for now, we'll swap it later" stopgap.
- Look at how mature products solve the same problem. Use proven patterns instead of inventing from zero.
Exception to rule 1 — anything holding state or money. A service on a cron touching a live account, a repo mid-migration, an API with external consumers: there, deleting an "obsolete" path is an incident, not a cleanup. Rule 1 applies only behind a test that covers the path being removed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 34 lines · 414 tokens per session scan A ec44c2196413
langflow-mcp CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository nobrainer-tech/langflow-mcp (10 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 414 tokens to every session, about $0.0021 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
mail-time AGENTS.md
Instructions for veliovgroup/mail-time, covering agents.md, mission, topology / tuning (read readme for use-cases), multiple instances — encouraged and one mail host: 2–8 servers.
mail-time CLAUDE.md
Instructions for veliovgroup/mail-time, covering claude.md, what this repo is, where to look first, mental model for changes and common pitfalls to avoid.
ndif CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for ndif-team/ndif, covering claude.md — ndif agent guide, what ndif is, top-level layout, architecture at a glance and security sandbox (the highest-stakes area).
chimp AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for softwaremill/chimp, covering rules, 1 - protocol conformance, 2 - tests organization, 3 - conformance tests and 4 - documentation.
GameServerManager AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for GSManagerXZ/GameServerManager, a project described as: GameServerManager(简称GSManager)现代化游戏一键部署面板,专为简化游戏服务器的部署、管理和维护而设计;注重steam、MC游戏一键开服.
silkweave CLAUDE.md
Instructions for silkweave/silkweave, covering claude.md, commands, mcp inspector (connects to mcp stdio example via .mcp.json), architecture and packages.