What the reviewer found
CLAUDE.md for the PDF-Tools project. The flagged text describes a build-integrity check (an artifact test that fails if a second module imports the vendored qpdf WASM runtime) and a worker-based timeout that bounds how long a hostile PDF may hold a CPU core, both defensive design notes, not instructions to bypass safety or run arbitrary shell commands.
What was read
The file as it ships in Open-Document-Alliance/PDF-Tools:
CLAUDE.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 3things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 3 as false.
P1Instruction-override phrasing — false positiveAR3Nullifies safety policies — false positiveSHRuns shell commands — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.