Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/papadanielvi/jamshid/claude-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PapaDanielVi/jamshidWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/papadanielvi/jamshid/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/papadanielvi/jamshid/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/papadanielvi/jamshid/claude-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01464 | $0.01464 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00732 | $0.00732 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00293 | $0.00293 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00146 | $0.00146 |
Grade A, and why
jamshid CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
1. [Step] → verify: [check]
2. [Step] → verify: [check]
3. [Step] → verify: [check]
Strong success criteria let you loop independently. Weak criteria ("make it work") require constant clarification.
5. Jamshid-Specific Notes
Testing: os.UserHomeDir() doesn't respect HOME env var. Use os.Getenv("HOME") in jamshidDir() for testability.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 88 lines · 1,464 tokens per session scan A b3615e4a3726
jamshid CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository PapaDanielVi/jamshid (5 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,464 tokens to every session, about $0.0073 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
ai-workflow AGENTS.md
Instructions for cunhaax/ai-workflow, covering ai workflow template, rules — non-negotiable, project overview, commands and architecture.
trackly-cli CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for trackly-app/trackly-cli, covering trackly-cli, tech stack, backend production source of truth, directory structure and key commands.
vibetags com-example-config-AsyncTestConfig.instructions.md
Instructions for PIsberg/vibetags, covering copilot instructions for asynctestconfig and immutable type.
pupila CLAUDE.md
Instructions for FranRom/pupila, covering claude.md, where things live, stack, run locally and repo layout.
claude-bridge AGENTS.md
Instructions for kadaba/claude-bridge, covering agents.md — using claude-bridge from any ai coding cli, two independent channels, 1. coordination (the conversation), 2. file transfer (the bytes) — same for every tool and workflows.
McpServer AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for sharpninja/McpServer, covering agent instructions, session start, rules, byrd test gate and where things live.