river-review docs.instructions.md

Documentation rules for a repository that turns review standards into reusable instructions for AI-assisted development. They cover structure, examples, indexes, translations, and operational documentation.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when writing or updating tutorials, how-to guides, reference pages, explanations, runbooks, and documentation indexes.
Why use it?
They keep documentation consistent with the repository and reduce outdated, misplaced, or poorly linked guidance.

Instructions file for GitHub Copilot

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/s977043/river-review/docs
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s977043/river-review

Made for: GitHub Copilot.

Per session 148 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 148 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00148 $0.00148
Opus 5 $0.00074 $0.00074
Sonnet 5 $0.00030 $0.00030
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00015

Measured 2d ago against content hash 19a6fa20a9f4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

river-review docs.instructions.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/instructions/docs.instructions.md · 15 lines

What it actually says

Documentation instructions

  • Match the repository’s existing documentation structure and conventions.
  • Prefer clear headings, short paragraphs, and runnable examples.
  • If docs appear to follow the Diátaxis split (tutorial/how-to/reference/explanation), keep the doc in the right category.
  • When adding a new doc:
    • add links from the appropriate index/README if one exists
    • keep multilingual pairing consistent with the repo’s convention (e.g., .en.md when used)
  • Don’t let docs drift: update them in the same PR as behavior changes.
  • Procedural content (setup/release/ops) should live under docs/runbook/ to keep responsibilities clear.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 15 lines · 148 tokens per session scan A 19a6fa20a9f4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

river-review docs.instructions.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository s977043/river-review (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 148 tokens to every session, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.