Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shigechika/gwsadm-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shigechika/gwsadm-mcp/main/CLAUDE.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shigechika/gwsadm-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/shigechika/gwsadm-mcp/claude-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/shigechika/gwsadm-mcp/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/shigechika/gwsadm-mcp/claude-md/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/shigechika/gwsadm-mcp/claude-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/shigechika/gwsadm-mcp/claude-md.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.03350 | $0.03350 |
| Opus 5 | $0.01675 | $0.01675 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00670 | $0.00670 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00335 | $0.00335 |
Grade A, and why
gwsadm-mcp CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 207 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CLAUDE.md
Overview
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Google Workspace security auditing.
Exposes login_audit (Google-side account locks, suspicious logins),
gmail_usage_report (daily Gmail send/receive counts per domain via Reports
API customerUsageReports, one date at a time ending yesterday in the
API's own UTC-8:00/PST anchor -- requires the separate
admin.reports.usage.readonly DWD scope, a DIFFERENT grant from
admin.reports.audit.readonly despite both being Reports API),
suspended_accounts (current suspended-account snapshot),
get_user (one named account's state — suspended/archived/2SV/last login —
via users().get, on the same admin.directory.user.readonly scope
suspended_accounts uses; a 404 answers found: false, never an error),
user_oauth_tokens (one user's third-party OAuth app grants),
drive_external_sharing (ACL grants to external targets, new link/public
exposure), drive_doc_activity (one document's owner + ACL/lifecycle
history via a server-side doc_id filter), shared_drive_membership_changes
(shared-drive member add/remove/role history), gmail_message_trace (did a
known Message-ID reach specific mailboxes, and where — Gmail API, requires
the separate gmail.readonly DWD scope, see its docstring),
dmarc_rua_summary (DMARC aggregate/RUA report pass/fail summary and top
reject-candidate source IPs, per domain — Gmail API against the domain's
configured dmarc_rua_mailbox, shares gmail_message_trace's
gmail.readonly DWD scope but reads attachment content, not just metadata),
group_delivery_policy (a Google Group's own posting/delivery policy —
Groups Settings API, requires the separate apps.groups.settings DWD
scope), list_group_members (a Google Group's metadata + member roster —
Directory API, requires the separate admin.directory.group.readonly and
admin.directory.group.member.readonly DWD scopes), and a daily_brief
combining the Reports-based tools, to AI assistants via STDIO transport,
built on the official mcp Python SDK's FastMCP. Read-only: the only
Admin SDK / Groups Settings / Gmail API methods called anywhere in this
package are activities().list (Reports API), customerUsageReports().get()
(Reports API, for gmail_usage_report -- same discovery document as
activities().list but a DIFFERENT DWD scope), users().list (Directory
API, for suspended_accounts), users().get (Directory API, for
get_user), tokens().list (Directory API, for
user_oauth_tokens), groups().get / members().list (Directory API, for
list_group_members), groups().get (Groups Settings API, for
group_delivery_policy), messages().list / messages().get (Gmail
API, format="metadata" only, for gmail_message_trace), and
messages().list / messages().get (format="full") /
messages().attachments().get() (Gmail API, for dmarc_rua_summary --
this one DOES read message/attachment content, not just metadata, since a
DMARC report's data lives in its attachment) — all read-only; no mutating
call exists.
The underlying googleapiclient.discovery.build() setup call also fetches
Google's discovery document over HTTP, separately from this guarantee.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · +15 lines · +276 tokens per session e0d699da44b6
- 9d ago First seen · 192 lines · 3,074 tokens per session scan A 979dbccaadce
gwsadm-mcp CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository shigechika/gwsadm-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3,350 tokens to every session, about $0.0168 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
next.js AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for vercel/next.js, covering next.js development guide, codebase structure, monorepo overview, core package: packages/next and other important packages.
codex AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for openai/codex, covering rust/codex-rs, the codex-core crate, code review rules, crate api surface and model visible context.
vscode buildNext.instructions.md
Working notes and architecture documentation for the new esbuild-based build system in build/next. Use when making changes to the new build pipeline (transpile/bundle commands, NLS plugin, source-map handling, resource copying, or self-hosting watch tasks).
vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.md
Instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code oss third-party-notices pipeline, architecture, pipeline flow in ci, applying the notice (cutover) and fallback chain (never fail the build).
langchain AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for langchain-ai/langchain, covering global development guidelines for the langchain monorepo, corridor security analysis, project architecture and context, monorepo structure and development tools & commands.
deepseek-harness AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for deepseek-ai/deepseek-harness, covering agents.md, pre-stable apis and released session data, repository layout, commands and host sandbox failures.