paranoia CLAUDE.md

Repository instructions for Paranoia, a local MCP server that lets Claude Code and Codex review each other’s code. It explains how reviews, evidence gathering, plans, implementation branches, and correction rounds should be handled.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when planning or reviewing code with the Paranoia server. It helps run plan reviews, implementation reviews, evidence checks, regression checks, and targeted correction rounds.
Why use it?
It gives agents a consistent process for adversarial code review and sets clear limits on review scope, evidence, and cost. This helps avoid reviewing the wrong branch or applying repeated patches without checking the underlying design.

Instructions file

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/subvertnormality/paranoia/claude-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/subvertnormality/paranoia
Per session 1,046 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 1,046 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.01046 $0.01046
Opus 5 $0.00523 $0.00523
Sonnet 5 $0.00209 $0.00209
Haiku 4.5 $0.00105 $0.00105

Measured 2d ago against content hash a334880af7a1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

paranoia CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

CLAUDE.md · 66 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Claude repository instructions

@AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md is canonical and must be followed in full. In particular:

  • write explicit, proportionate, frozen stakes rather than vague “high stakes” language;
  • after plan approval, review the implementation branch—not the plan—unless design is explicitly reopened, and label runs PLAN versus CODE;
  • treat recurring classes as an architecture checkpoint, not permission for another patch;
  • use broad cold structural coverage for tracked plan and branch census/final regression, while targeting intervening correction rounds to open debt and correction effects;
  • prioritize accurate, fast, workable behavior and a small architecture over out-of-scope hardening;
  • keep operational timeouts generous enough for normal thorough reviews; control runaway cost with bounded calls, batches, packet sizes, and phases rather than truncating valid model work;
  • keep plan claim verification on by default with reviewer-native search used only for URL discovery, server-controlled HTTP(S) capture and Trafilatura extraction, same-session binding with browsing disabled, a cold authority/entailment attestation, no Claude WebFetch, official/primary evidence, hard UGC non-authority, exact actionable source packets, and retained-evidence freezing for exact unchanged supported claims after exhaustive round 1; mechanically limit inventory to external facts, externally issued design principles/requirements, and promised external-system behaviors; leave repository mechanics, internal history, implementation conformance, and function bridges to structural/code review and tests; target model/web work at edited, new, refuted, and unverified external claims, requiring a full current captured and cold-attested packet for every non-freezable claim instead of compact-verdict churn; accept only canonical HTTP(S) sources as governing evidence; validate retained inventory before capture; attest exact replacement wording independently; compose per-claim limits with aggregate capture/binding and whole-plan monotonic budgets; persist evidence debt before the structural phase; and fail closed over active legacy state;
  • never let the plan under review serve as evidence for its own assertions; bind claims to authoritative external sources;
  • let the calling coding agent autonomously edit from those packets before the next round; no human is required, and an unchanged rerun is not a correction;
  • apply the same capture boundary to default-on arbitration research; deciders get one identical packet and no live web, caller IDs are rejected across the complete rendered packet, and initialized submodule snapshots record their checked-out commit, while research: false is explicitly repository-only;
  • route snapshotting, materialization, refs, labels, citations, trees, symlinks, and blob reads through the shared inert Git launcher so missing promised objects cannot lazy-fetch;
  • require claim closure, class closure, real acceptance, updated docs, and a governing computed CONVERGENCE: NOT-BLOCKED before delivery.
  • preserve class closure on staged plan and branch reviews: explicitly disposition every governing finding as one-off/new/existing, bind every new record, use the canonical class engine, and expose CLASS-REGISTER and CLASS-CLOSURE; structural debt alone is not feature parity. Ambiguous persistence uses CLASS-CLOSURE: STATE-UNAVAILABLE, not unconfirmed class counts.
  • preserve an atomic lane finding that violates several active classes and let its source disposition fan out to one distinct governing finding per affected class; do not split the observation merely to satisfy the settlement schema. Require every repeated-source target to be an existing-class finding backed by its own distinct violated assessment citing that source.
  • include the exact server-rendered class decision surface in the initial staged prompt retained by the one same-session validation retry: preserve outcome-free standalone lifecycle actions, non-downgrading severity, both legal unmechanized branch replacement forms (procedural replacement and mechanized replacement), mechanization-preserving replacement, and the distinct census/final/debt-bound correction/fresh-finding outcome-authority paths. A violated gated class requires replacement. Keep the 100-class/schema/provider boundary, durable failure diagnostics, and atomic settlement unchanged; this remains all-or-nothing settlement, with no cross-round repair state.
  • derive the deterministic close for a satisfied open unmechanized class, and reuse a complete post-validation-rejection census only when its snapshot, full body/debt input, stakes, mode, active-class state, engine settings, plan context, exact composed lane prompts, and cache schema all match exactly; execution failure, timeout, cancellation, and failed retry delete older cache, persist as generic staged failure, and are never reusable. Only terminal consolidation validation uses validation debt; lane, follow-up, and consolidation-preflight validation are structured staged failures carrying exact role, kind, and message; preserve timeout, unavailable, provider, execution, and retry roles rather than flattening them.

Read the full file on GitHub · 66 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 66 lines · 1,046 tokens per session scan A a334880af7a1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

paranoia CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository subvertnormality/paranoia (13 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,046 tokens to every session, about $0.0052 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other instructions, from other repositories

spec-kit AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md instructions for github/spec-kit, covering agents.md, about spec kit and specify, quickstart — add a new integration in 5 steps, integration architecture and integrationmanifest — file tracking.

github/spec-kit · 7,104 tokens

vscode buildNext.instructions.md

Working notes and architecture documentation for the new esbuild-based build system in build/next. Use when making changes to the new build pipeline (transpile/bundle commands, NLS plugin, source-map handling, resource copying, or self-hosting watch tasks).

microsoft/vscode · 6,785 tokens

codex AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md instructions for openai/codex, covering rust/codex-rs, the codex-core crate, code review rules, crate api surface and model visible context.

openai/codex · 5,182 tokens

langchain AGENTS.md

AGENTS.md instructions for langchain-ai/langchain, covering global development guidelines for the langchain monorepo, corridor security analysis, project architecture and context, monorepo structure and development tools & commands.

langchain-ai/langchain · 4,345 tokens

vscode oss-third-party-notices.instructions.md

Instructions for microsoft/vscode, covering vs code oss third-party-notices pipeline, architecture, pipeline flow in ci, applying the notice (cutover) and fallback chain (never fail the build).

microsoft/vscode · 5,001 tokens

next.js AGENTS.md

Instructions for vercel/next.js, covering next.js development guide, codebase structure, monorepo overview, core package: packages/next and other important packages.

vercel/next.js · 7,296 tokens