What the reviewer found
Design documentation for a security-hardening layer (Arcana/roboot) describing its own defenses: a danger detector that catches base64-decoded payloads piped to a shell, an allowlist that rejects entries containing shell metacharacters, and normalization against encoding tricks. Every flagged passage describes protection the tool provides, not an action it performs.
What was read
The file as it ships in tyxben/roboot:
CLAUDE.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 4things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 4 as false.
SC2Downloads and executes remote code — false positiveSC3Encoded or obfuscated payload — false positiveRMRecursive force delete — false positiveNETMakes network calls — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.