Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/ucsandman/dashclaw/gemini-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ucsandman/DashClawWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.01379 | $0.01379 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00690 | $0.00690 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00276 | $0.00276 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00138 | $0.00138 |
Grade A, and why
DashClaw GEMINI.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 325 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DashClaw Development Context
This file provides operational context for AI coding agents working inside the DashClaw repository.
Agents must treat this repository as a production open source infrastructure project. All modifications should prioritize stability, developer clarity, and maintainability.
DashClaw is infrastructure software. Avoid introducing complexity unless it clearly improves reliability or developer experience.
Project Overview
DashClaw is a governance runtime for AI agent decisions.
It governs AI agents before they execute real world actions by introducing a policy evaluation and approval layer.
Core decision flow:
Agent intent -> policy evaluation -> approval or block -> execution -> decision evidence recorded
DashClaw acts as the decision governance layer between AI agents and external systems.
The platform allows developers and organizations to:
- intercept risky agent actions
- enforce policy checks
- require human approval
- record verifiable decision evidence
- monitor agent behavior
- detect decision drift
DashClaw enables permissioned autonomy for AI agents.
Core Product Primitives
These primitives define the DashClaw architecture.
Guard
Evaluates policies before an agent executes an action.
Example usage:
const decision = await claw.guard({ actionType: "deploy", riskScore: 85 })
Guard responses determine whether actions are:
- allowed
- blocked
- escalated for approval
Action Records
Capture what the agent attempted to do.
Includes:
- action type
- parameters
- reasoning
- execution outcome
Assumptions
Tracks what the agent believed to be true when making a decision.
Used to detect decision drift and incorrect reasoning.
Approvals
Allows high risk actions to pause until a human operator approves or rejects them.
Evidence
Every governed decision produces verifiable evidence.
Evidence enables:
- debugging agent behavior
- compliance reporting
- post incident analysis
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 325 lines · 1,379 tokens per session scan A a8c177344856
DashClaw GEMINI.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository ucsandman/DashClaw (296 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,379 tokens to every session, about $0.0069 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other instructions, from other repositories
holon AGENTS.md
Instructions for holon-run/holon, covering repository guidelines, project structure & module organization, product intent, development priorities and coding style & naming conventions.
Jixu AGENTS.md
Instructions for joe960913/Jixu, covering jixu repository instructions, 1. read order, 2. sources of truth, 3. canonical concepts and 4. architecture invariants.
holon CLAUDE.md
Instructions for holon-run/holon: This file is read by Claude Code and other agent tooling.
kdcube AGENTS.md
Instructions for kdcube/kdcube, covering agents.md — operating rules for coding agents, shared ground rules (both classes), a. platform contributors, git and shared-tree etiquette and code architecture.
Core-Memory CLAUDE.md
Instructions for JohnnyFiv3r/Core-Memory, covering claude.md — core memory, what this repo is, guiding principle — engineering simplicity, boring primitives, rich views and mapping to the current codebase.
OpenMAO AGENTS.md
Instructions for OpenMAO/OpenMAO, covering agents.md - openmao agent protocol, start here, stay on course, hard rules and working protocol.