smriti CLAUDE.md

Repository instructions for Smriti, a shared memory system for AI-assisted engineering teams. They tell the coding agent how to recall past context and save important decisions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them at the start of work to search Smriti for relevant history, and during work to record chosen approaches, discovered constraints, and understood fixes.
Why use it?
They reduce repeated explanations and help preserve decisions, constraints, and bug findings between coding sessions.

Instructions file

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/zero8dotdev/smriti/claude-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zero8dotdev/smriti
Per session 2,832 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 2,832 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.02832 $0.02832
Opus 5 $0.01416 $0.01416
Sonnet 5 $0.00566 $0.00566
Haiku 4.5 $0.00283 $0.00283

Measured 2d ago against content hash 01e0ae0780a9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

smriti CLAUDE.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

CLAUDE.md · 317 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 317 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Smriti

Shared memory layer for AI-powered engineering teams. Built on QMD.

Memory

You have Smriti. USE IT.

Start of Every Session

Before writing a single line of code, run:

smriti recall "[what we're about to work on]"

Use what comes back. If there's prior context on this topic, it changes how you approach the work. Don't ignore it.

Recognize These Moments — Then Act Immediately

No permission needed. No asking "should I save this?" Just do it.

  • Someone says "this works" or "let's go with this"
  • An approach is chosen after comparing options
  • A bug is fixed and the root cause is understood
  • A constraint is discovered that will affect future work
  • An architectural decision is made

WRONG: Continue the conversation without saving. RIGHT: Write the decision record, ingest it, tag it — then respond.

How to Save a Decision

Step 1 — Write the record:

cat > /tmp/smriti-note.md << 'EOF'
# [Title]

## Decision
[One sentence — the actual choice made.]

## Why
[The reasoning. What was considered. What was ruled out and why.]

## Context
[What problem this solves. What breaks if someone reverses this later.]
EOF

Step 2 — Ingest:

smriti ingest file /tmp/smriti-note.md \
  --title "[Title]" \
  --project smriti

Step 3 — Tag:

smriti tag [session-id] [category]

Categories

What happened Tag
Architecture choice, approach finalized decision/technical
Library or tool selected decision/tooling
Bug fixed, root cause identified bug/fix
Structural design settled architecture/design
Feature approach finalized feature/implementation
Config or setup figured out project/config

Concrete Example

User says: "Okay let's use post-filtering for vector search with filters"

WRONG:

"Got it, I'll use post-filtering."

RIGHT:

cat > /tmp/smriti-note.md << 'EOF'
# Vector search with filters: post-filter approach

## Decision
Use post-filter strategy for applying metadata filters to vector search
results, rather than combining sqlite-vec queries with EXISTS subqueries.

## Why
sqlite-vec's two-step query pattern hangs when combined with Smriti's
EXISTS subqueries on metadata tables. Post-filtering runs vector search
unfiltered (3x overfetch), then filters results against session metadata
in a separate batch lookup — no sqlite-vec changes needed.

## Context
Affects smriti recall when --project, --category, or --agent flags are
used. Without this, filtered recall loses semantic search entirely and
falls back to BM25 only.
EOF

smriti ingest file /tmp/smriti-note.md \
  --title "Vector search with filters: post-filter approach" \
  --project smriti

smriti tag [session-id] decision/technical

Read the full file on GitHub · 317 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 317 lines · 2,832 tokens per session scan A 01e0ae0780a9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

smriti CLAUDE.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository zero8dotdev/smriti (37 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 2,832 tokens to every session, about $0.0142 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.