Getting it into your agent
There is no command for this one: it runs only inside a plugin, and the catalogue could not identify which plugin ships it. The source is linked below.
Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/mcp/joaocarlos/writing-context-rtfm/code-review-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/joaocarlos/writing-context-rtfm/code-review-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/joaocarlos/writing-context-rtfm/code-review-graph/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/joaocarlos/writing-context-rtfm/code-review-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/joaocarlos/writing-context-rtfm/code-review-graph.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
code-review-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"code-review-graph": {
"command": "uvx",
"args": [
"code-review-graph",
"serve"
],
"cwd": "/Users/joaocarlos/Developer/Projects/writing-context-rtfm",
"type": "stdio"
}
}What else .mcp.json configures
This page is one entry in a file that holds 2. Installing the file brings all of them; each is measured and scanned on its own page.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines scan A 803d82c87afd
code-review-graph is an MCP server published in the GitHub repository joaocarlos/writing-context-rtfm (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: an MCP server costs its tool schemas, not its config file. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other mcp servers, from other repositories
better-code-review-graph
Knowledge graph for token-efficient code reviews -- semantic search and call-graph resolution across your codebase. Runs locally from the better-code-review-graph Python package. Needs 4 environment variables to run.
shadcn
Add components to your apps. Runs locally from the shadcn npm package.
codereview-mcp
MCP server "codereview-mcp" as configured in lfylow/codereview-mcp. Runs locally from the codereview-mcp Python package.
docs-langchain
MCP server "docs-langchain", hosted remotely at docs.langchain.com, as configured in langchain-ai/langchain.
component-explorer
MCP server "component-explorer" as configured in microsoft/vscode. Launched with npm exec --no -- component-explorer mcp -p ./test/componentFixtures/component-ex.
codex_message_board
MCP server "codexmessageboard", hosted remotely at 127.0.0.1, as configured in openai/codex.