code-review-graph

code-review-graph is an MCP server for Cursor from raysonmeng/agent-bridge. Its token cost is not measured, scanned A, a copy of code-review-graph, MIT.

A local knowledge graph for reviewing source code through MCP, a standard way for tools to exchange context with an agent, and a command-line interface.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to support reviews of a codebase, including investigating relationships between code elements and discussing possible issues.
Why use it?
It organizes code-review context locally so an agent can work with less repeated text and repository scanning.

MCP server for Cursor

Written for Cursor: installed under .cursor/. Also seen: listed in .cursor/mcp.json.

Good fit Use it to support reviews of a codebase, including investigating relationships between code elements and discussing possible issues.

Compare 6 mcp servers from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add mcp/raysonmeng/agent-bridge/code-review-graph
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/raysonmeng/agent-bridge

Made for: Cursor.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review-graph

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/raysonmeng/agent-bridge/code-review-graph.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/mcp/raysonmeng/agent-bridge/code-review-graph)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/raysonmeng/agent-bridge/code-review-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/raysonmeng/agent-bridge/code-review-graph.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured Not applicable: nothing here is loaded into a session.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits How audits are shown
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to code-review-graph — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.cursor/mcp.json · 10 lines

What it actually says

{
  "code-review-graph": {
    "command": "uvx",
    "args": [
      "code-review-graph",
      "serve"
    ],
    "type": "stdio"
  }
}
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 10 lines scan A 62b3f9e9de80

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-graph is an MCP server published in the GitHub repository raysonmeng/agent-bridge (330 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: an MCP server costs its tool schemas, not its config file. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to code-review-graph, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.