Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ready-to-release/eacWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/mcp/ready-to-release/eac/commands)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/ready-to-release/eac/commands"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/ready-to-release/eac/commands/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/ready-to-release/eac/commands"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/ready-to-release/eac/commands.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
commands scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What else .mcp.json configures
This page is one entry in a file that holds 2. Installing the file brings all of them; each is measured and scanned on its own page.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 13 lines scan A 5aa52d499a52
commands is an MCP server published in the GitHub repository ready-to-release/eac (28 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: an MCP server costs its tool schemas, not its config file. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other mcp servers, from other repositories
squirrelscan
Website QA for your coding agent: audit SEO, performance, security, accessibility over MCP. Remote server at mcp.squirrelscan.com.
cloud-audit
Open-source, read-only AWS security scanner. 110 checks across 25 services, 31 attack-chain rules, 64 IAM escalation methods (incl. lateral AssumeRole graph), Proof Mode exploitability verification, data perimeter and Bedrock AgentCore checks, Blast Radius CLI, Threat Feed, What-If simulator, AI-SPM, 6 compliance…
mcp-audit
MCP Permission Auditor — scan, enumerate, and risk-score all locally configured MCP servers. Runs locally from the mcp-audits Python package.
pseolint
Penalty-risk audit for programmatic SEO sites: verdict, risk score, and a fix manifest. Runs locally from the @pseolint/mcp npm package. Needs 2 environment variables to run.
legitshow-search
Search launched software (SaaS, AI tools, MCP servers) by measured production-readiness. Runs locally from the legitshow-mcp npm package.
audit
Score any public GitHub repo 0-100 against the commit.show audit rubric. Runs locally from the commitshow-mcp npm package.