Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Richard-Ewing/serversWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/mcp/richard-ewing/servers/exogram)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/richard-ewing/servers/exogram"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/richard-ewing/servers/exogram/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/richard-ewing/servers/exogram"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/richard-ewing/servers/exogram.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
exogram scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 12 lines scan A 24142a8d6824
exogram is an MCP server published in the GitHub repository Richard-Ewing/servers (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: an MCP server costs its tool schemas, not its config file. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It comes from a forked repository.
exogram compared with mcp servers from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| exogramRichard-Ewing/servers | MCP server | 0 | 1mo ago | none | A | — | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode |
| docs-langchainlangchain-ai/langchain | MCP server | 149k | yesterday | MIT | A | — | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode |
| component-explorermicrosoft/vscode | MCP server | 195k | yesterday | MIT | A | — | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode |
| codex_message_boardopenai/codex | MCP server | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | — | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode |
| playwright-testmicrosoft/playwright | MCP server | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | — | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode |
| reference-langchainlangchain-ai/langchain | MCP server | 149k | yesterday | MIT | A | — | Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode |
| reamorluto/rea | MCP server | 435k | yesterday | MIT | A | — | Claude Code |