Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/UtakataKyosui/PR-Review-Resolve-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/mcp/utakatakyosui/pr-review-resolve-mcp/pr-review-mcp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/utakatakyosui/pr-review-resolve-mcp/pr-review-mcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/utakatakyosui/pr-review-resolve-mcp/pr-review-mcp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/mcp/utakatakyosui/pr-review-resolve-mcp/pr-review-mcp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/mcp/utakatakyosui/pr-review-resolve-mcp/pr-review-mcp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
pr-review-mcp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{ "pr-review-mcp": { "command": "uvx", "args": [ "pr-review-mcp" ] } }
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 8 lines scan A 18a67b7a3ed7
pr-review-mcp is an MCP server published in the GitHub repository UtakataKyosui/PR-Review-Resolve-MCP (0 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: an MCP server costs its tool schemas, not its config file. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other mcp servers, from other repositories
mergewarden
Check whether a coding agent's changes stayed inside the scope it was given. Runs locally from the mergewarden-mcp npm package.
github-pr-review-mcp
MCP server for GitHub PR reviews and code analysis using FastMCP. Provides AI-powered code review comments, security analysis, and automated feedback for pull requests. Runs locally from the github-pr-review-mcp npm package.
mcp-devils-advocate
MCP server "mcp-devils-advocate" as configured in AleBrito124356/mcp-devils-advocate. Runs locally from the mcp-devils-advocate Python package. Needs 1 environment variable to run.
ffmpeg-mcp
MCP server "ffmpeg-mcp" as configured in vikisingh23/neuraforge-ai. Runs locally from the ffmpeg-mcp npm package.
docs-langchain
MCP server "docs-langchain", hosted remotely at docs.langchain.com, as configured in langchain-ai/langchain.
component-explorer
MCP server "component-explorer" as configured in microsoft/vscode. Launched with npm exec --no -- component-explorer mcp -p ./test/componentFixtures/component-ex.