Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
/plugin marketplace add acaprino/daodannpx agentmods add plugins/acaprino/daodan/peer-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/acaprino/daodanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/acaprino/daodan/peer-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/acaprino/daodan/peer-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/acaprino/daodan/peer-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
peer-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"author": {
"name": "Alfio Caprino"
},
"description": "Cross-model peer review of plans, specs, and the decisions a session has just made: a harness-agnostic deliberation protocol (challenge packet with GIVEN-tagged context, challenger findings that each carry their own falsifier, evidence-backed responses at a stable locator, a verbatim ledger, a certification pass the challenger owns, and a verdict computed from the ledger) plus a transport-only MCP server for any OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Point it at a document, or run it with no path to materialize the session's context, settled decisions and open questions into a frozen brief and put that on trial. The challenger attacks the artifact, the local session refutes with evidence, and unresolved disagreements terminate as precise standoffs for the user to settle",
"license": "MIT",
"name": "peer-review",
"version": "2.2.0"
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 10 lines scan A 56c58158b15f
peer-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository acaprino/daodan (8 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other plugins, from other repositories
nextjs
Official Next.js skills: adopt and optimize Cache Components, adopt Partial Prefetching, and verify runtime behavior against a running dev server.
claude-plugins-official marketplace
Directory of popular Claude Code extensions including development tools, productivity plugins, and MCP integrations.
humanizer
Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads naturally without changing what it says.
knowledge-work-plugins marketplace
Plugin marketplace listing 98 plugins: noibu, productivity, enterprise-search, cowork-plugin-management, sales.
mattpocock-skills
Matt Pocock's agent skills for real engineering: grilling, spec/ticket flows, TDD, code review, domain modelling and more. Plug-and-play, not vibe coding.
container
Teaches Claude container's command surface and how it maps to Docker, Lima, Colima, and Podman on macOS.