Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/litigation-paralegal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/litigation-paralegal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/litigation-paralegal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/litigation-paralegal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins/litigation-paralegal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
litigation-paralegal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "litigation-paralegal",
"description": "Summarize depositions, build case timelines, draft motions, and manage discovery holds",
"version": "1.0.0",
"author": {
"name": "The AI Career Lab",
"email": "[email protected]"
},
"homepage": "https://theaicareerlab.com/professions/paralegal",
"repository": "https://github.com/alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": ["legal", "litigation", "paralegal", "discovery", "depositions"],
"category": "legal"
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 2 skills, 1 command travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 69 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 15 lines scan A 94533aba15ed
litigation-paralegal is a plugin published in the GitHub repository alexclowe/awesome-claude-cowork-plugins (30 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-24.
Other plugins, from other repositories
eu-ai-act
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5), Annex III high-risk use cases, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations and systemic risk (Arts. 51–55, enforcement Aug 2, 2026), conformity…
nis2
EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) compliance advisor for essential and important entities — entity classification, Art. 21 risk management measures, Art. 23 incident reporting timelines (24h/72h/1 month), Art. 20 governance obligations, supply chain security (Art. 26), gap assessments, policy drafting, ISO…
nist-ai-rmf
Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor — gap assessments, organizational profiles, GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE function guidance, AI risk registers, trustworthiness evaluation, and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, EU AI Act, and NIST CSF.
swift-csp
SWIFT CSP / CSCF v2026 expert covering all 32 controls (26 mandatory + 6 advisory), including Control 2.4 now mandatory (back-office data flow security). Architecture types A1–A4/B, KYC-SA attestation (window July 1–Dec 31, 2026), independent assessment, gap analysis, fraud prevention, and cross-framework mapping.
iso27001
Expert ISO 27001 gap analysis, policy writing, Annex A control guidance, SoA generation, and risk register creation for both 2013 and 2022 versions.
tsa-compliance
TSA cybersecurity compliance advisor for critical infrastructure — pipeline, freight rail, and transit Security Directive requirements including CIP/COIP, IRP, ADR, CAP, incident reporting, and OT/ICS security.