Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/AltimateAI/claude-consensusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/altimateai/claude-consensus/consensus)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/altimateai/claude-consensus/consensus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/altimateai/claude-consensus/consensus/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/altimateai/claude-consensus/consensus"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/altimateai/claude-consensus/consensus.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
consensus scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "consensus",
"version": "1.8.0",
"description": "Configurable multi-model code review, plan review, and general review with consensus convergence for Claude Code",
"author": {
"name": "AltimateAI"
},
"repository": "https://github.com/AltimateAI/claude-consensus",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": ["code-review", "plan-review", "review", "multi-model", "consensus", "configurable"]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 8 skills, 4 commands travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 352 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill claude-consensus A 33 tokens
- Skill consensus-plan-review A 48 tokens
- Skill consensus-setup A 35 tokens
- Skill code-review A 35 tokens
- Skill consensus-code-review A 35 tokens
- Skill plan-reviwe A 37 tokens
- Skill consensus-review A 22 tokens
- Skill plan-review A 34 tokens
- Command code-review B 18 tokens
- Command plan-review B 19 tokens
- Command review B 20 tokens
- Command consensus-setup B 16 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 12 lines scan A 537603bef2fe
consensus is a plugin published in the GitHub repository AltimateAI/claude-consensus (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
technology
Architecture, engineering delivery, development discipline, debugging, review, and AI and automation systems.
supergraph
Evidence-gated AI coding workflow: scan → analyze → plan → TDD → execute → fix → verify → review, powered by Codebase Memory MCP >= 0.10.8,<0.11.0 with optional Serena LSP intelligence, 7 specialized subagents, and native Rust CDP browser/API automation. Includes blast-radius planning, test/cycle gates, independent…
cadence
A plan/execute/verify loop for a single developer in Claude Code, with adversarial review at every gate: plans and diffs get refuted by a fresh Claude subagent or a panel of outside models (OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek), not just approved. State lives in files, not the conversation, so you clear aggressively and keep both.
dev-mcp
Narzedzia deweloperskie MateMatic (advanced): spec-driven development, kanon budowy MCP serverow, recenzent PR dla LegalTech AI, generator instalatora marketplace. Bez konektorow.
rook-maintainer
Maintainer-grade skills for rook (github.com/rook/): code review, backlog triage, systemic-PR campaigns, and the rook house conventions they enforce.
magi
Multi-model engineering workflow with MAGI weighted voting and cross-CLI orchestration.