Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dsnger/dev-workflow-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/dsnger/dev-workflow-kit/dev-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/dsnger/dev-workflow-kit/dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/dsnger/dev-workflow-kit/dev-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/dsnger/dev-workflow-kit/dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/dsnger/dev-workflow-kit/dev-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
dev-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "dev-workflow",
"displayName": "Cross-Model Review Workflow",
"version": "0.29.0",
"description": "Spec-driven workflow with two independent cross-model review gates, an append-only hardening ledger for lint and test hardening, and repo-enforced quality. Requires the superpowers plugin.",
"author": {
"name": "Daniel Sänger",
"email": "[email protected]"
},
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": ["workflow", "code-review", "codex", "quality-gate", "hardening"]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 4 skills, 3 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 417 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill intake A 73 tokens
- Skill sparring A 76 tokens
- Skill harden-finding A 67 tokens
- Skill ticket A 89 tokens
- Command claude-init A 21 tokens
- Command process-pr-review A 14 tokens
- Command workflow-init D 22 tokens
- Agent finding-triage A 55 tokens
- Hook PostToolUse A not measured
- Hook PreToolUse A not measured
- Hook SessionStart A not measured
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed 2b64671a48a3
- yesterday Changed fd7b83f60079
- 4d ago Changed b7f68887f625
- 6d ago Changed c29647ea8104
- 7d ago Changed 7841369859e2
- 9d ago Changed 63f9eb351732
- 10d ago Changed 56f59480e8fa
- 11d ago Changed 54dea0fcfed8
- 15d ago Changed 38aa369a9507
- 17d ago First seen · 13 lines scan A 1780eb077114
dev-workflow is a plugin published in the GitHub repository dsnger/dev-workflow-kit (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
brooks-lint
AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and six analysis modes (PR review, architecture audit, tech debt, test quality, health dashboard, full-sweep auto-fix).
ring-dev-team
24 specialized developer agents + 35 development skills. Backend (Go/TypeScript) and frontend (React/Next.js) dev cycles, DevOps, QA, SRE, and the parallel code-review pool.
ring-pm-team
Pre-dev planning workflows: 4-gate and 8-gate orchestrators for PRD, TRD, OpenAPI contracts, schema design, and a phased plan. 14 skills + 4 research agents.
argot
A guardrail that flags code foreign to a repo's own patterns — learned from git history. Bundles the argot-setup, argot-refresh, argot-check, argot-review-pr, argot-setup-ci, argot-write-rule, and argot-suggest-rules skills, the argot MCP server, and an opt-in, non-blocking pre-write guardrail hook.
anti-slop-brain
Anti-Slop Brain Obsidian brain for detection and repair of AI slop in prose, code, documentation, and agent output, grounded in corpus evidence rather than authorship detection.
claude-playbook
Engineering guardrails for Claude Code: path-scoped rules, review and verification skills, specialist subagents, and hooks that enforce what instructions only request.