Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
/plugin marketplace add Eivor79/ai-debate-pluginnpx agentmods add plugins/eivor79/ai-debate-plugin/ai-debategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Eivor79/ai-debate-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/eivor79/ai-debate-plugin/ai-debate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/eivor79/ai-debate-plugin/ai-debate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/eivor79/ai-debate-plugin/ai-debate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
ai-debate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"$schema": "https://json.schemastore.org/claude-code-plugin-manifest.json",
"name": "ai-debate",
"displayName": "AI Debate Review",
"version": "0.5.2",
"description": "Open a review topic and AI agents (Claude, Codex) debate it round after round -- design, attack, rebuttal -- fully hands-free until they deliver a reasoned decision.md. Multi-topic priority queue with a hardened unattended coordinator; human approval only for code changes. Windows + (beta) macOS/Linux, git and non-git projects, claude-solo fallback when codex is missing.",
"author": {
"name": "Eivor79"
},
"license": "MIT",
"homepage": "https://github.com/Eivor79/ai-debate-plugin",
"repository": "https://github.com/Eivor79/ai-debate-plugin"
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill, 4 commands travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 230 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 14 lines scan A 64e6189b22ef
ai-debate is a plugin published in the GitHub repository Eivor79/ai-debate-plugin (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
adversarial-review
Cross-host adversarial review for coding workflows. Material-only findings include over-engineering and missed reuse. Provider routing uses Codex GPT-5.6 Luna max, OpenCode Go DeepSeek V4 Flash xhigh, direct Moonshot Kimi K3 xhigh, direct-xAI Grok 4.5 high, and Gemini 3.7 Flash High first in the Antigravity ladder.
omniforge
AI-powered code review toolkit — review MRs/PRs with 3 parallel adversarial agents, auto-fix review findings, verify applied changes, and create MRs/PRs from commits. Supports both GitLab and GitHub. 19 MCP tools, git worktree isolation, confidence-scored findings.
river-review
Turn review into an organizational judgment asset. Review Judgment as Code for AI-assisted development, delivered as a capability pack for Claude Code: your team's review criteria as versioned, repo-owned skills (a Skill Registry), driven by a review agent that runs perspective-based reviewer roles (code, security…
codex-debate
Second opinions: iterative adversarial debates between Claude and Codex over any subject, from specs, designs, and code to non-technical positions, ending in genuine agreement or a documented dispute.
claude-bionify
Bionic reading for Claude's responses that bolds the leading part of each word to guide your eyes and enable you to read faster.
rails-consultant marketplace
Plugin marketplace listing 1 plugin: rails-consultant.