Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EvotecIT/DesktopManagerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/evotecit/desktopmanager/desktopmanager-windows-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/evotecit/desktopmanager/desktopmanager-windows-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/evotecit/desktopmanager/desktopmanager-windows-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/evotecit/desktopmanager/desktopmanager-windows-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/evotecit/desktopmanager/desktopmanager-windows-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
desktopmanager-windows-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "desktopmanager-windows-verification",
"version": "0.2.1",
"description": "Inspect Windows desktop apps and verify requested interactions with screenshots and control evidence.",
"author": {
"name": "Evotec Services sp. z o.o.",
"email": "[email protected]",
"url": "https://evotec.xyz"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/EvotecIT/DesktopManager",
"repository": "https://github.com/EvotecIT/DesktopManager",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"desktopmanager",
"windows",
"desktop",
"automation",
"mcp",
"verification"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 2 skills, 1 MCP server travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 77 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What ships with it
1 file beside plugin.json in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 22 lines scan A b7d27998867a
desktopmanager-windows-verification is a plugin published in the GitHub repository EvotecIT/DesktopManager (107 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-16.
Other plugins, from other repositories
rust-developer
Comprehensive Rust development assistance for building, testing, and deploying Rust applications with cargo, clippy, async patterns, and framework support.
kit
Spec-driven Claude Code workflow with verification pipeline. Hooks, slash commands, and verification subagents.
pict-test-designer
Design comprehensive test cases using PICT (Pairwise Independent Combinatorial Testing) for any piece of requirements or code. Analyzes inputs, generates PICT models with parameters, values, and constraints for valid scenarios using pairwise testing. Outputs the PICT model, markdown table of test cases, and expected…
local-test-plugin
Symlink-based local plugin testing for development workflow.
claude-md-management
Tools to maintain and improve CLAUDE.md files - audit quality, capture session learnings, and keep project memory current.
humanizer
Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says.