Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/existential-birds/beagle/beagle-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/existential-birds/beagle/beagle-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/existential-birds/beagle/beagle-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/existential-birds/beagle/beagle-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/existential-birds/beagle/beagle-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
beagle-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "beagle-analysis",
"description": "Architecture analysis, brainstorming, ADR generation, LLM-as-judge comparison, and spec gap resolution.",
"version": "2.10.0",
"author": {
"name": "Existential Birds, LLC",
"email": "[email protected]"
},
"repository": "https://github.com/existential-birds/beagle",
"keywords": [
"12-factor",
"architecture",
"brainstorm-beagle",
"resolve-beagle",
"prfaq-beagle",
"write-plan",
"tdd-planning",
"implementation-plan",
"working-backwards",
"press-release",
"concept-filter",
"web-research",
"artifact-analysis",
"adr",
"llm-judge",
"analysis",
"strategy",
"strategic-planning",
"wardley-mapping",
"blue-ocean",
"porter-five-forces",
"mckinsey-7s",
"balanced-scorecard",
"competitive-analysis",
"business-strategy",
"strategy-review"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 14 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 1,918 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill write-plan A 170 tokens
- Skill strategy-review A 107 tokens
- Skill artifact-analysis A 192 tokens
- Skill brainstorm-beagle A 106 tokens
- Skill quick-plan A 230 tokens
- Skill prfaq-beagle A 167 tokens
- Skill web-research A 165 tokens
- Skill llm-judge A 104 tokens
- Skill resolve-beagle A 170 tokens
- Skill adr-writing A 104 tokens
- Skill write-adr A 98 tokens
- Skill adr-decision-extraction A 113 tokens
- Skill agent-architecture-analysis A 93 tokens
- Skill strategy-interview B 99 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines scan A 156500afcab7
beagle-analysis is a plugin published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (84 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
ai-sdlc
AI-SDLC governance framework for Claude Code — action enforcement, telemetry, quality gates, and review agents.
git-pr-workflows
Git workflow automation, pull request enhancement, and team onboarding processes.
code-refactoring
Code cleanup, refactoring automation, and technical debt management with context restoration.
python-dev
Python development workflow with architecture design, coding guidelines, testing patterns, and specialized review agents.
code-quorum
Slash commands for /q-plan, /q-brainstorm, /q-skystorm, /q-validate, /q-review, /q-research via the quorum MCP server.
of-loop
Stable Claude Code adapter for the vendor-neutral OwnFramework Loop autonomous engineering runtime.