Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/FutureRootsDE/legal-audit-deWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/marketplace)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/marketplace"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/marketplace/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/marketplace"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/futurerootsde/legal-audit-de/marketplace.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
futureroots-legal marketplace scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
The plugins it lists here
This marketplace lists 1 plugin kept in the same repository. Each has its own page, its own measurements and its own install command.
What ships with it
1 file beside marketplace.json in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 55 lines scan A 9a842ea8fce2
futureroots-legal marketplace is a plugin published in the GitHub repository FutureRootsDE/legal-audit-de (36 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
claude-grc-engineering marketplace
Plugin marketplace listing 66 plugins: grc-engineer, grc-auditor, grc-internal, grc-tprm, grc-reporter.
eu-nis2
EU NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) — Reference plugin: scope determination across essential vs important entities, Article 21 risk-management measure evidence checklist, and the 24h/72h/1mo incident-reporting runbook. SCF-backed gap assessment via the crosswalk.
nist-csf-20
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (v2.0) — Reference plugin with scope determination, evidence checklist, and SCF-backed gap assessment across the six Functions (GV/ID/PR/DE/RS/RC).
us-ccpa
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) / California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance for businesses subject to California Civil Code §1798.100 et seq., enforced by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) and the California Attorney General.
us-sox
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) — Reference-depth plugin for ICFR scoping, IT General Control (ITGC) testing, and §302/§404/§906 evidence preparation. Frames SOX as the governance layer over ICFR; security work flows in via ITGCs and SOC 1 reliance on vendor systems.
testssl-inspector
GRC connector wrapping testssl.sh. Scans HTTPS endpoints for protocol/cipher posture, certificate issues, and known TLS CVEs (Heartbleed, ROBOT, POODLE, FREAK, LOGJAM, SWEET32, ...). Emits findings conforming to schemas/finding.schema.json v1, anchored on SCF CRY-01/CRY-03/CRY-05/CRY-08/NET-09/VPM-01/VPM-06/WEB-03 and.