Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/galihcitta/code-review-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/galihcitta/code-review-agents/marketplace)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/galihcitta/code-review-agents/marketplace"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/galihcitta/code-review-agents/marketplace/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/galihcitta/code-review-agents/marketplace"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/galihcitta/code-review-agents/marketplace.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
code-review-agents marketplace scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "code-review-agents",
"owner": {
"name": "Galih Citta"
},
"plugins": [
{
"name": "code-review-agents",
"source": {
"source": "github",
"repo": "galihcitta/code-review-agents"
},
"description": "Orchestrate a 5-agent team to review PRs with structured scoring across 10 categories",
"version": "1.0.0",
"author": {
"name": "Galih Citta"
},
"repository": "https://github.com/galihcitta/code-review-agents",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": ["code-review", "pull-request", "merge-request", "agent-team"]
}
]
}
The plugins it lists here
This marketplace lists 1 plugin kept in the same repository. Each has its own page, its own measurements and its own install command.
What ships with it
1 file beside marketplace.json in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 24 lines scan A 02870fe55d43
code-review-agents marketplace is a plugin published in the GitHub repository galihcitta/code-review-agents (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
han-communication
Foundational communication plugin for the Han suite. Owns the canonical readability standard, the writing-voice profile, and the explanation standard for talking to a reader who will not implement the work, plus the readability-guidance skill that surfaces the first two into a calling skill's own context for in-voice…
pedantic-coder
Zero-tolerance code pedantry — naming precision, casing law, structural symmetry, import discipline, and the obsessive details that separate clean code from correct code.
ai-infra-auto-driven-skills
Agent-ready playbooks for LLM serving benchmarks, SGLang model Day-0 support, capacity planning, profiling, code review, incidents, PR-history dossiers, and SGLang PR/article explainer videos.
git-pr
Committing, PR creation and review triage, and dependency upgrades.
code-quality
OxLint, Biome, and Prettier configuration, linting skills, and pre-commit hooks for consistent code quality.
coderabbit
CodeRabbit integration for Claude Code - local code review and PR comment management.