Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineeringWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/grcengclub/claude-grc-engineering/grc-diagrams)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/grcengclub/claude-grc-engineering/grc-diagrams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/grcengclub/claude-grc-engineering/grc-diagrams/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/grcengclub/claude-grc-engineering/grc-diagrams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/grcengclub/claude-grc-engineering/grc-diagrams.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
grc-diagrams scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 20 lines scan A e7aad25f1f80
grc-diagrams is a plugin published in the GitHub repository GRCEngClub/claude-grc-engineering (427 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-07.
Other plugins, from other repositories
eu-ai-act
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5), Annex III high-risk use cases, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations and systemic risk (Arts. 51–55, enforcement Aug 2, 2026), conformity…
nist-ai-rmf
Expert NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) advisor — gap assessments, organizational profiles, GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE function guidance, AI risk registers, trustworthiness evaluation, and cross-framework mapping to ISO 42001, EU AI Act, and NIST CSF.
swift-csp
SWIFT CSP / CSCF v2026 expert covering all 32 controls (26 mandatory + 6 advisory), including Control 2.4 now mandatory (back-office data flow security). Architecture types A1–A4/B, KYC-SA attestation (window July 1–Dec 31, 2026), independent assessment, gap analysis, fraud prevention, and cross-framework mapping.
tsa-compliance
TSA cybersecurity compliance advisor for critical infrastructure — pipeline, freight rail, and transit Security Directive requirements including CIP/COIP, IRP, ADR, CAP, incident reporting, and OT/ICS security.
sox-itgc
SOX ITGC advisor — the four IT general control domains auditors test for SOX 404 (access, change management, operations, development), system scoping, risk-and-control matrices, control narratives and test scripts, deficiency evaluation (AS 2201 / Reg S-X ladder), remediation planning, filer-status and IPO timelines…
legal-docs
Write and audit the legal documents of a SaaS — terms, privacy policy, security policy, consumer buttons — deduced from the real schema, providers and pixels instead of a template. Audit mode compares what the published text promises against what the code actually does. Covers Argentina, EU (GDPR), US, Brazil (LGPD)…