Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GSkuza/ai-polish-text-expertWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/gskuza/ai-polish-text-expert/ai-polish-text-expert-plugin)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/gskuza/ai-polish-text-expert/ai-polish-text-expert-plugin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/gskuza/ai-polish-text-expert/ai-polish-text-expert-plugin/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/gskuza/ai-polish-text-expert/ai-polish-text-expert-plugin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/gskuza/ai-polish-text-expert/ai-polish-text-expert-plugin.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
ai-polish-text-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill, 2 commands, 2 MCP servers travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 0 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 13 lines scan A 36d5c60f6a17
ai-polish-text-expert is a plugin published in the GitHub repository GSkuza/ai-polish-text-expert (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), with no licence file. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
csrd
EU CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor — scope & threshold analysis (large PIEs, other large, listed SMEs, non-EU), double materiality assessment (DMA), ESRS gap assessment, ESRS E1–E5 environmental disclosures, ESRS S1–S4 social disclosures, ESRS G1 governance, Scope…
dpdpa
India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) and DPDP Rules, 2025 compliance advisor — gap analysis, notice and consent requirements, Data Principal rights, breach notification, children's data, Significant Data Fiduciary obligations, cross-border transfers, Data Protection Board proceedings, and GDPR…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847. Covers product classification (Default/Class I/Class II), Annex I essential requirements gap analysis, conformity assessment (self-assessment vs Notified Body), CE marking, SBOM, vulnerability handling, 24/72-hour ENISA reporting, support…
dora
DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) compliance advisor for EU financial entities — ICT risk management framework, incident classification and reporting, TLPT, ICT third-party risk, Register of Information, and all adopted RTS/ITS with article-level citations.
fedramp
End-to-end FedRAMP authorization guidance under CR26 — Certification Classes A-D, FedRAMP 20x pathway, readiness assessments, SSP narratives, POA&M management, NIST 800-53 Rev 5 control mapping, OSCAL mandate, and ConMon support.
iso27701
ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) advisor — gap analysis, PIMS implementation, Annex A control guidance, SoA generation, privacy risk assessment, GDPR alignment, and certification readiness for ISO/IEC 27701:2025 (standalone PIMS) and 27701:2019.