brooks-lint

brooks-lint is a plugin for Gemini CLI from hyhmrright/brooks-lint. Its token cost is not measured, scanned A, original, MIT.

An AI code-review tool that checks software for decay risks using ideas from twelve engineering books. It can review pull requests, architecture, technical debt, tests, overall project health, or perform a full sweep with suggested fixes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review proposed changes, audit an architecture, identify technical debt, assess tests, create a health report, or apply fixes across the codebase.
Why use it?
It helps find maintainability and test-quality problems that may be missed during a normal review. Severity labels and book citations explain why each issue matters.

Plugin for Gemini CLI

Written for Gemini CLI: a Gemini CLI extension manifest.

Good fit Use it to review proposed changes, audit an architecture, identify technical debt, assess tests, create a health report, or apply fixes across the codebase.

Compare 6 plugins from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension
About the project

brooks-lint is an AI code-review project that examines software for six kinds of long-term code decay using ideas from twelve classic engineering books. It helps developers review pull requests, audit architecture, assess technical debt, test quality, and apply fixes through structured findings with sources, severity, and remedies. Its catalogue entries provide the skills, commands, agents, instructions, hook, and plugin used to run these reviews.

hyhmrright/brooks-lint · 1,542 stars · on GitHub · hyhmrright.github.io

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/hyhmrright/brooks-lint

Made for: Gemini CLI.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for brooks-lint

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for brooks-lint

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/hyhmrright/brooks-lint/gemini-extension.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured Not applicable: nothing here is loaded into a session.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

brooks-lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

The scan reads gemini-extension.json. This mod also ships 23 executable files (scripts/assemble-prompt.mjs, scripts/benchmark.mjs, scripts/bump-version.mjs, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

gemini-extension.json · 75 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

{
  "name": "brooks-lint",
  "version": "1.8.0",
  "description": "AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and six analysis modes (PR review, architecture audit, tech debt, test quality, health dashboard, full-sweep auto-fix)",
  "author": "hyhmrright",
  "license": "MIT",
  "repository": {
    "type": "git",
    "url": "https://github.com/hyhmrright/brooks-lint.git"
  },
  "engines": {
    "gemini": ">=0.30.0"
  },
  "contribution": {
    "skills": [
      {
        "id": "brooks-review",
        "path": "skills/brooks-review"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-audit",
        "path": "skills/brooks-audit"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-debt",
        "path": "skills/brooks-debt"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-test",
        "path": "skills/brooks-test"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-health",
        "path": "skills/brooks-health"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-sweep",
        "path": "skills/brooks-sweep"
      }
    ],
    "commands": [
      {
        "id": "brooks-review",
        "description": "PR-level code review across six decay risk dimensions",
        "path": "commands/brooks-review.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-audit",
        "description": "Full architecture audit with module dependency map",
        "path": "commands/brooks-audit.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-debt",
        "description": "Tech debt classification ranked by Pain × Spread",
        "path": "commands/brooks-debt.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-test",
        "description": "Test suite health review across six test decay risks",
        "path": "commands/brooks-test.md"
      },
      {
        "id": "brooks-health",
        "description": "Combined health dashboard aggregating all four quality dimensions (PR review, architecture, tech debt, test quality) into a single weighted score",
        "path": "commands/brooks-health.md"
  

Read the full file on GitHub · 75 lines

Files

What ships with it

36 files beside gemini-extension.json in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago Changed 81caa0b550c8
  2. 1mo ago Changed df0ba96543ef
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines scan A 471973ca072f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

brooks-lint is a plugin published in the GitHub repository hyhmrright/brooks-lint (1,542 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.

Related

Other plugins, from other repositories

logic-lens

Logic-first code review using semi-formal execution tracing. Surfaces behavioral bugs, type contract breaches, boundary blindspots, and interprocedural semantic mismatches — the logic errors that cause production incidents in syntax-clean code.

hyhmrright/logic-lens · not measured

logic-lens

Logic-first code review using semi-formal execution tracing. Surfaces behavioral bugs, semantic errors, and runtime failures that linters miss.

hyhmrright/logic-lens · not measured

craftsman

Ship something with Lovable, Replit, Bolt, v0, Claude Code, or Codex and it works, but nobody with an engineering background has checked it. This is the engineering review you'd get from the technical co-founder you don't have. craft-audit checks the whole project across ten areas: UX, frontend, backend, database…

gul-labs/craftsman-marketplace · not measured

graph-it-live

Dependency, call-graph, impact, and architecture analysis for codebases.

magic5644/Graph-It-Live · not measured

omen-development

Code analysis skills for active development: find bugs, assess impact, plan refactoring, audit architecture, and more.

panbanda/omen · not measured

ai-architect-mcp-codebase

Rust MCP server that indexes ANY codebase into a LadybugDB property graph — source in 11 languages with full AST, plus docs/config/binaries as File nodes (.js→Imports, Markdown→References). Resolves imports and call chains, detects communities via Leiden, traces execution flows from entry points, and exposes 27 MCP…

cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase · not measured