Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeeJuOh/claude-code-zeroWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/leejuoh/claude-code-zero/codex-advisor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/leejuoh/claude-code-zero/codex-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/leejuoh/claude-code-zero/codex-advisor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/leejuoh/claude-code-zero/codex-advisor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/leejuoh/claude-code-zero/codex-advisor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
codex-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "codex-advisor",
"description": "Get Codex's second opinion — and actually trust it: a different model reviews your code, plans, and research, and a fresh independent verifier subagent — never the session that wrote the work — judges every finding (Agreed/Disputed/Nuanced/Unverifiable, plus False Positive/Uncited from the citation script) before you act, catching hallucinated citations. Skills: setup, review, adversarial, rescue, verify, research, status, result, cancel, transfer. Task delegation (rescue) wraps your verbatim request in adaptive, preview-approved prompt blocks. Transfer hands the whole session off to a resumable Codex thread (v1.0.5+). Prompt-running skills accept --model/--effort via config.toml, also passed at run time when a project's own .codex/config.toml would override them.",
"author": { "name": "LeeJuOh" },
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": ["codex", "double-check", "cross-model", "evaluation", "review", "verification", "research", "status", "cancel", "transfer"]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 10 skills, 1 agent travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 390 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill codex-rescue A 50 tokens
- Skill codex-adversarial A 46 tokens
- Skill codex-research A 52 tokens
- Skill codex-verify A 42 tokens
- Skill codex-transfer A 25 tokens
- Skill codex-result A 16 tokens
- Skill codex-status A 16 tokens
- Skill codex-cancel A 13 tokens
- Skill codex-review B 53 tokens
- Skill codex-setup B 30 tokens
- Agent verifier A 47 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago Changed 07072ec059c2
- 26d ago Changed 90286f6251de
- 1mo ago First seen · 8 lines scan A 637b26484bd1
codex-advisor is a plugin published in the GitHub repository LeeJuOh/claude-code-zero (52 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
code-review
Code review plugin.
diffctx
Selects the minimum code an LLM needs to review a git diff.
adversarial-review
Requires a task result to survive two consecutive independent adversarial reviews before completion.
code-review
Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring.
atc-skills
A 12-skill depth pack for ATC — the ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference (formerly the USENIX Annual Technical Conference): USENIX's broad practical-systems venue now under SIGOPS, the new two-round extended-abstract HotCRP review, double-blind reviewing, the Deployed Systems / experience-paper track, USENIX-lineage.
humanizer
Rewrite AI-sounding text so it reads like the writer without changing what it says.