Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leodisa/compliance-review-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/leodisa/compliance-review-skill/compliance-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/leodisa/compliance-review-skill/compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/leodisa/compliance-review-skill/compliance-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/leodisa/compliance-review-skill/compliance-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/leodisa/compliance-review-skill/compliance-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
compliance-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "compliance-review",
"version": "1.4.0",
"description": "Build or review code for compliance with the EU AI Act, GDPR, the NIS2 Directive (EU 2022/2555), and secure-development (SSDLC) best practice. Three modes: repo gap analysis, compliance-by-design while coding, and data protection — the skill asks whether to pseudonymise (deterministic tokens, joins preserved) or anonymise (drop identifiers, generalise, k-anonymity) and never exposes raw personal data. Advisory only.",
"author": {
"name": "LDS"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/leodisa/compliance-review-skill",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"compliance",
"nis2",
"gdpr",
"eu-ai-act",
"security",
"audit",
"gap-analysis",
"compliance-by-design",
"ssdlc",
"secure-coding",
"owasp",
"data-masking",
"pseudonymisation"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 238 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 26 lines scan A a93aea02418d
compliance-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository leodisa/compliance-review-skill (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
ccpa
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) compliance advisor — business threshold analysis, consumer rights fulfillment, ADMT opt-out (Jan 2027 deadline), cybersecurity audits and risk assessments (live Jan 2026), enforcement precedents (Disney $2.75M record), privacy notice…
csrd
EU CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor — scope & threshold analysis (large PIEs, other large, listed SMEs, non-EU), double materiality assessment (DMA), ESRS gap assessment, ESRS E1–E5 environmental disclosures, ESRS S1–S4 social disclosures, ESRS G1 governance, Scope…
dpdpa
India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDPA) and DPDP Rules, 2025 compliance advisor — gap analysis, notice and consent requirements, Data Principal rights, breach notification, children's data, Significant Data Fiduciary obligations, cross-border transfers, Data Protection Board proceedings, and GDPR…
eu-ai-act
EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) compliance advisor — risk classification across all four tiers, all 9 prohibited practices (Art. 5), Annex III high-risk use cases, provider and deployer obligations (Arts. 9–17, 26), GPAI model obligations and systemic risk (Arts. 51–55, enforcement Aug 2, 2026), conformity…
eu-cra
Expert EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) advisor for Regulation (EU) 2024/2847. Covers product classification (Default/Class I/Class II), Annex I essential requirements gap analysis, conformity assessment (self-assessment vs Notified Body), CE marking, SBOM, vulnerability handling, 24/72-hour ENISA reporting, support…
cmmc
Expert CMMC 2.0 compliance advisor for US defense contractors — gap analysis, SSP drafting, POA&M management, SPRS scoring, CUI scoping, and C3PAO assessment readiness for Level 1, 2, and 3.