Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NikiforovAll/claude-code-rulesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules/handbook-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules/handbook-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules/handbook-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules/handbook-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules/handbook-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
handbook-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "handbook-code-review",
"version": "1.0.1",
"description": "Code review plugin with a standalone reviewer agent and two skill strategies: disposable subagents for one-shot reviews and persistent team members for iterative reviews",
"author": {
"name": "nikiforovall",
"url": "https://github.com/nikiforovall"
},
"homepage": "https://nikiforovall.blog/claude-code-rules/",
"repository": "https://github.com/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"code-review",
"subagent",
"team",
"reuse",
"quality",
"efficiency"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 2 skills, 1 agent travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 154 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 21 lines scan A fe39fe34281b
handbook-code-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository NikiforovAll/claude-code-rules (141 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
review-pr
Review PRs in a Tour Guide (expository) or Adversarial (audit) posture, with logical file ordering, context, and severity-rated findings. Forge-agnostic (GitHub + Bitbucket).
code-review
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.
odin-code-advanced
Advanced ODIN workflows for complex code changes and technical audits.
adversarial-review
Cross-host adversarial review with material-only findings and mandatory over-engineering counterfactuals. Author-aware routing: Claude-authored work goes to Codex GPT-6 Astra high, then Grok 4.7 xhigh; Codex-authored work goes to Grok 4.7 xhigh, never back to Codex; then the Pi chain (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Kimi K3) and…
slopmop marketplace
Slop-mop quality gates as a Claude skill — directed remediation for AI-assisted codebases.
mem-rescue
Diagnose and fix memory pressure (full swap, crashing browser tabs) in one or two commands. macOS first, Linux best-effort. Agent-agnostic SKILL.md plus two bundled scripts.