rad-code-review

rad-code-review is a plugin for Claude Code from RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-Skills. Its manifest loads nothing; the 1 skill it bundles cost 172 tokens per session together, scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-review tool that combines general bug finding with checks for made-up imports, security mistakes, weak tests, and unsafe patterns in several programming languages and frameworks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Rust, and Go code; check frameworks such as Next.js, Express, Django, Rails, and Supabase; and track which review findings are new, recurring, or fixed.
Why use it?
It helps catch problems that a normal review may miss, including dependencies that are not in the project and security rules that code appears to enforce but does not.

Plugin for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-Skills
agentmods
npx agentmods add plugins/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/rad-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-Skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rad-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/rad-code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/rad-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/rad-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/radorigin-llc/rad-claude-skills/rad-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured The manifest loads nothing itself; its 1 skill cost 172 tokens a session between them.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

rad-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

archive/plugins/rad-code-review/.claude-plugin/plugin.json · 26 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 26 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

{
  "name": "rad-code-review",
  "version": "6.2.0",
  "description": "The specialist lanes and memory that the built-in /code-review doesn't have. Invokes the built-in engine for general bug-finding (quick/standard/deep map to its effort levels), then adds what it lacks: a mechanical hallucinated-imports validator (lockfile-verified across Python/JS/TS/Rust/Go, with a vendored denylist of documented malicious typosquat names and did-you-mean suggestions, offline always); an AI-slop lane refreshed for agentic-era failures (test capitulation, deleted-guard regressions, weak-assertion tests, hardcoded expected outputs, scope-creep refactors, XSS/log-injection sink focus — every pattern sourced and labeled mechanical-vs-judgment); framework IDOR heuristics (Next.js server actions incl. the middleware-is-not-a-boundary anti-pattern, Express/Fastify, Django, Rails, Go); a Supabase/Firebase BaaS-RLS lane with a reachability gate and do-NOT-flag list; and deterministic findings memory — findings-index.py computes fingerprints and assigns stable CR-NNN IDs across runs, so reports show new/recurring/resolved mechanically, never from model memory.\n\n--security-deep runs a 4-phase launch-readiness pass (trust boundaries → data-exposure surface → authorization model → secrets) under a no-false-assurance contract: it never emits a \"safe to launch\" verdict, reports verified-vs-could-not-verify, and recommends a human pen-test. --verify-model runs the lane pass on a different model tier for a cross-tier second opinion. Fix application touches the working tree only — this plugin never commits. Scope is diff/branch/PR only; whole-repo wants /code-review ultra. Deep accessibility belongs to rad-a11y; over-engineering hunts to ponytail-review.\n\nTwo optional external passes bolt on when the tools are present, and skip themselves silently when they are not: a cross-model adversarial pass via the rad-codex plugin (an independent GPT second opinion on the same diff, standard/deep), a

Read the full file on GitHub · 26 lines

Contents

What it installs

The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 172 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 26 lines scan A 3ba461cca215

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rad-code-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-Skills (5 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other plugins, from other repositories