Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sethdford/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/sethdford/claude-skills/architecture-governance)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/sethdford/claude-skills/architecture-governance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/sethdford/claude-skills/architecture-governance/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/sethdford/claude-skills/architecture-governance"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/sethdford/claude-skills/architecture-governance.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
architecture-governance scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "architecture-governance",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "Establish architecture governance, design fitness functions, manage tech debt, and ensure compliance. Build sustainable architecture practices.",
"author": { "name": "Seth Ford" },
"keywords": [
"architect",
"governance",
"fitness-function",
"compliance",
"tech-debt"
],
"license": "MIT"
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 7 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 242 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines scan A 7461e594336c
architecture-governance is a plugin published in the GitHub repository sethdford/claude-skills (45 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
pragma
Deterministic linting hooks, semantic code validators, and a multi-LLM advisory council. Enforces coding rules mechanically — not by suggestion.
frontier
Standards written and audited by Claude Fable 5: make Opus, Sonnet, GPT, or Gemini produce work close to its bar. 21 craft rubrics, best-of-N candidates, convergence sweeps, a taste gate with permanent distillation.
vibes-plug
Universal AI Agent Swarm & MCP plugin with 176 specialized skills and 8 autonomous subagents for Antigravity, Claude Code, Cursor, and OpenAI Codex.
code-review-assistant
Automated code review with severity levels and actionable feedback.
community-coding
Code quality, review, and deployment skills vendored from the web.
code-review
Automated code review for pull requests using multiple specialized agents with confidence-based scoring.