principal-review

principal-review is a plugin for Claude Code from thapr0digy/skills. Its manifest loads nothing; the 1 skill, 1 agent it bundles cost 108 tokens per session together, scanned A, original, MIT.

A two-stage code quality check that reviews the design before coding and the final code changes before a task ends.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review implementation plans and inspect completed code changes for engineering risks.
Why use it?
It catches scalability, maintainability, performance, and tangled-code problems before they become harder to fix.

Plugin for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code plugin manifest.

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add thapr0digy/skills
agentmods
npx agentmods add plugins/thapr0digy/skills/principal-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thapr0digy/skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for principal-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/thapr0digy/skills/principal-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/thapr0digy/skills/principal-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/thapr0digy/skills/principal-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/thapr0digy/skills/principal-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured The manifest loads nothing itself; its 1 skill, 1 agent cost 108 tokens a session between them.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

principal-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/principal-review/.claude-plugin/plugin.json · 7 lines

What it actually says

{
  "name": "principal-review",
  "version": "0.1.0",
  "description": "Two-gate principal-engineer quality check: a design-time skill that reviews an approach for scalability and maintainability before code, and a Stop-hook code gate that reviews the diff for performance and spaghetti anti-patterns before a task completes.",
  "author": { "name": "thapr0digy" }
}
Contents

What it installs

The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill, 1 agent travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 108 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 7 lines scan A 5b42c2d80dbd

Subscribe to this mod's changes

principal-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository thapr0digy/skills (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.